Today's Articles

  • for abuse-offender topics this one is revolting. Re: My little sister nude

    Question:

    I don’t find this treatment of ones siblings to be amusing.  I can’t stand the language used in this message.  Does your sister know you published this information about her on the internet? Does she know  the way you talk about her?  I think it’s revolting to hear people carry on like this. I came to this site to read about abuse-offender topics from a deeper point of veiw than what you seem to have.

    Caught my little sister undressing in front of my webcam whilst it was

    turned on, check her little titties in the pictures ive posted —- —–= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =—– http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! —–==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups – 19 Different Servers! =—–

    Response:

    I came here to learn about abuse recovery not to be a victim of your filth.  What does your sister think of the way you talk about her? Does she know you published information about her on the web??

    Caught my little sister undressing in front of my webcam whilst it was

    turned on, check her little titties in the pictures ive posted —- —–= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =—– http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! —–==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups – 19 Different Servers! =—–

    Response:


  • Judge orders couple not to have children

    Question:

    Don Nettlepatch writes: > ……….yet another con job……….in fact many times people who > are forced to shape up find out damn certain that they had been > screwign up badly and start signing on for every kind of personal > development and rehabilitiation they can find.

    Hi, Don! Really? In my post to Sherman, who questioned the effectiveness of forced residential drug treatment, I said that 3 out of ten graduates of those programs stay sober for at least a year.  These successes seem to be dependent upon their voluntary participation in self-help groups throughout that year.  I don’t know whether that was consistent with what you are saying, but I have never seen anyone flock to sign up for "every kind of personal development or rehabilition" they could find. With this particular population, such a rabid "Patty Duke" search for rehab would be especially dangerous because it would defocus them from working on their central problem. > Most people with drug and alcohol "problems" by that fact alone deny > it until something or someone smacks’em upside the head.

    Usually, the denial ends when they recognize their own behaviors have smacked them upside the head.  AA calls it "hitting bottom."  The denial does not end when someone else smacks them beside the head.  Alkies and addicts get smacked a lot on the head, but they "keep coming back." > The death of a child as a result being high or nodded out on the part > of the parent is a huge wakeup call…I’ve known a couple of folks > that it took that much to get them rolling.

    Yes, that would be a wake up call.  There are many wake up calls, if not as tragic, in an addicts life.  The point is what they do afterwards.  For many, all they can think about in the morning light is drinking or drugging to deal with the guilt and same. > On the other hand CPS creates just that kind of wakeup call for many > druggies.

    I was not talking about CPS’s referrals to residential treatment.  In my post about residential treatment centers I spoke of involuntary clients being given the choice of treatment or prison by their probation officers. The wording was not by accident.  For instance, not far from where I live there is a 23-bed residential treatment center.  The center has a catchment area of 8 rural counties, which are served by eight CPS offices.  It is run by a not-for-profit and the state picks up the tab for clients referred to the 30 day program for treatment.  Last year, Seventy-Eight percent of 293 people of both genders were involuntary clients. 224 of the involuntary clients were referred by probation and parole.  2 were court ordered in leiu of jail, in one case, and a mental health facility, in the other.  1 was referred by CPS. Across the nation, much of the services/sanctions other than substance abuse treatment offered by CPS are involuntary, of course.  My reference in the post was that a lot of their clients jump through those hoops.  The question remains, as Sherman asked about treatment centers, whether the interventions are successfull in causing the behavioral changes they are intended to change. I will repeat here what I said in the first post.  Interventions of probation and parole in ordering residential treatment for chemical dependency and CPS services are successfull in a small percentage of cases. Thirty percent tops for chemical dependency, perhaps the same or less for CPS. > Are you suggesting that drug and alcohol addicted folks with children > be ignored until something as serious as sever injury or death of a > child wakes them up to their need for services?

    Of course not.  I would suggest that children should not be removed from their families simply because CPS workers think their parents have a substance abuse problem.  CPS’s job is to determine if children are abused or neglected or are at risk of same. > Yer a damn fool, Doug. You don’t seem to know much about this subject > that is outside the books, and at that, only the ones that agree with > you. There is considerable professional discrepancy on your claims.

    I don’t know much as I would like about anything.  In the field of addictions treatment, there is a great deal of controversy between both lay people and professionals.  Treatment models are debated; residential vs outpatient treatment is debated; the efficacy of treatment itself is questioned.  But the cornerstone to all behavioral change is the client’s motivation or readiness to make changes.  An element to that motivation is recognization of the problem. > Even the books don’t universally, or even in the main, support your > contention here.

    I made a number of contentions.  Some of them would be supported by the mainstream.  Some, perhaps not.  As I said, it is a matter of debate. > Should your logic apply to violent crimals as well, just wait around > for them to seek services to better the odds it will take?

    It would be illogical to extend the treatment model to criminals.  Your argument is absurd. Ironically, however, you touch on one of the central problems with childwelfare practice.  One of the underlying problems in dysfunctional field practice is the errant attempt to apply the medical model to child abuse.  Child abuse is not a disease.  Child abuse is a crime.  If someone punches you in the mouth, they are charged with a crime and, if found guilty, go to jail.  If someone punches a child in the mouth, they get "services" and psychotherapy. > Have you had professional experience with the treatment of D&A > dependent folks?

    Yes. http://www.aafp.org/afp/20000415/2401.html > Everything about a drug dependent person points to intervention being > the major way out. The people that society, the community, and the > family wait around to wake up are on all the skid roads of the cities > of this country.

    Did you surmise from my post that I am somehow against involuntary interventions for chemically dependent people?? Sherman made a comment inferring that forced residential treatment for chemical dependency was ineffective.  I replied with information about how effective it was and what type of client was more likely to make the behavioral changes necessary for long term abstinance.  I also mentioned that some start involuntarily but decide in treatment that they do have a problem. I was not editorializing on whether interventions could be made or not. > Or do you think it’s just another "industry"

    Chemical dependency treatment?  It pays those who work in it. > The major component of "addiction

    …is making the same mistakes and expecting different results. Thanks for the opportunity to discuss this issue.  I appreciate your comments. Doug

    Response:

    On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 09:39:16 -0400, "Doug" <do…@charter.net> wrote:

    ……….yet another con job……….in fact many times people who are forced to shape up find out damn certain that they had been screwign up badly and start signing on for every kind of personal development and rehabilitiation they can find. Most people with drug and alcohol "problems" by that fact alone deny it until something or someone smacks’em upside the head. The death of a child as a result being high or nodded out on the part of the parent is a huge wakeup call…I’ve known a couple of folks that it took that much to get them rolling. On the other hand CPS creates just that kind of wakeup call for many druggies. Are you suggesting that drug and alcohol addicted folks with children be ignored until something as serious as sever injury or death of a child wakes them up to their need for services? Yer a damn fool, Doug. You don’t seem to know much about this subject that is outside the books, and at that, only the ones that agree with you. There is considerable professional discrepancy on your claims. Even the books don’t universally, or even in the main, support your contention here. Should your logic apply to violent crimals as well, just wait around for them to seek services to better the odds it will take? Have you had professional experience with the treatment of D&A dependent folks? http://www.aafp.org/afp/20000415/2401.html Everything about a drug dependent person points to intervention being the major way out. The people that society, the community, and the family wait around to wake up are on all the skid roads of the cities of this country. Or do you think it’s just another "industry" The major component of "addiction – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Sherman writes: >> Have you any proof whatsoever that forcing someone into any type of >> substance abuse "treatment" has been effective? >> Nope, thought not. >Hi, Sherman! >Actually, yes.  Involuntary treatment for chemical dependency is effective >in a low percentage of cases.  It is no less effective than forced CPS >services to families, and no more effective, but it does work on occassion. >If a client of any service does not believe they have a problem, no >proffered treatment or service is going to be effective.  This is basic >social work.  Clients are capable of jumping through the hoops — as they do >for CPS and chemical dependency residential treatment centers — but no >progress is made to addressing the problem.  CPS makes its money…substance >abuse counselors make their money…but the client returns to the probematic >behavior immediately after the intervention ends.  What does happen to some >clients legally forced into residential treatment for substance abuse is a >change of mind toward the end of the stay; every once in a while a client >"gets it" and comes to the realization they have a problem.  Only when they >want the solution — for themselves — can they move ahead and get anything >out of the treatment.  That happens with CPS interventions as well.  But >such cases in either population are rare. >Most state-funded residential treatment centers serve a clientele made up >primarily of people forced into treatment by probation officers, parole >boards or the court.  Around 80% of the clients are forced to be there — or >given an undigestable choice like 30 years in prison or 30 days in >treatment.  (Some of them give a lot of thought to the options…"let me >think about it and get back to you.") <g> >Outcome studies are rare in this field (as they are in child protective >work).  But some studies put success rates at 30% for those in the entire >residential population who successfully complete the treatment AND actively >participate in  12-STEP GROUPS as part of their aftercare.  ("Success" is >measured as uninterrupted sobriety for one year).  Treatment followed by >therapy or counseling alone has exceedingly poor outcomes — around 2% to >4%.  The causal variable seems to be Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics >Anonymous or similar self-help groups. >Keep in mind that the 30% positive outcome is from the ENTIRE population, >20% of which would be voluntary clients.  So it is possible that the >voluntary clients are overrepresented in the group that succeeded.  It is >politically incorrect to propose a research design to measure the relative >success rates of involuntary clients versus voluntary, so it will be hard to >find research that measures mandated clients’ success individually.  It is >bound, of course, to be lower than the 30%. >Bureaucracies (in this case probation and parole) are invested into forced >treatment — a form of punishment to them — and frown upon anyone shedding >negative light on mandatory treatment. >A good residential treatment center will use the Minnesota Model of >treatment, which intertwines 12-step theory and practice with >rational-emotive, cognitive-behavioral, reality therapy, or another >therapuetic approach.  Counselors will use any one of these clinical >approaches (depending on where the client is) while at the same time >introduce the client to 12-step groups.  As a general rule, the first three >"steps" are worked at the center and many residential treatment centers make >a concerted effort to allow clients to attend outside AA or NA meetings to >become familiar with the protocol of the meetings and get to know the >members.  The idea is to do as much as one can to pass on the client from >residential treatment to 12-step groups. >Recovery from addiction is a lifetime endeavor.  No addict comes out of >residential treatment "cured."  The best graduates exit with a few tools and >the knowledge of how to apply them to stay sober on the "outside."   If they >did not enter the center with the motivation to change their way of life for >themselves or gain that motivation while in treatment, they leave with >neither the tools or the knowledge of how to apply them. >Residential treatment for substance abuse, like ALL other forms of social >intervention, will not be effective unless the client believes they have a >problem and directly participates in setting goals in his treatment plans. >This is just as true in family interventions.  The clients must be invested >in the need for the services and actively construct along with the clinician >or worker the treatment or safety plan that will lead to solving the >client’s problems.  If the client does not believe he has a problem or has >not participated in working on the plan for solving it, the intervention is >doomed to failure. >The exceptions residential treatment centers see are those involuntary >clients who actually experience a change of mind or attitude during their >stay that convinces them they DO have a problem.  Only then does treatment >begin. >I hope this was helpful to you, Sherman. >Doug

    Response:

    Sherman writes: > Have you any proof whatsoever that forcing someone into any type of > substance abuse "treatment" has been effective? > Nope, thought not.

    Hi, Sherman! Actually, yes.  Involuntary treatment for chemical dependency is effective in a low percentage of cases.  It is no less effective than forced CPS services to families, and no more effective, but it does work on occassion. If a client of any service does not believe they have a problem, no proffered treatment or service is going to be effective.  This is basic social work.  Clients are capable of jumping through the hoops — as they do for CPS and chemical dependency residential treatment centers — but no progress is made to addressing the problem.  CPS makes its money…substance abuse counselors make their money…but the client returns to the probematic behavior immediately after the intervention ends.  What does happen to some clients legally forced into residential treatment for substance abuse is a change of mind toward the end of the stay; every once in a while a client "gets it" and comes to the realization they have a problem.  Only when they want the solution — for themselves — can they move ahead and get anything out of the treatment.  That happens with CPS interventions as well.  But such cases in either population are rare. Most state-funded residential treatment centers serve a clientele made up primarily of people forced into treatment by probation officers, parole boards or the court.  Around 80% of the clients are forced to be there — or given an undigestable choice like 30 years in prison or 30 days in treatment.  (Some of them give a lot of thought to the options…"let me think about it and get back to you.") <g> Outcome studies are rare in this field (as they are in child protective work).  But some studies put success rates at 30% for those in the entire residential population who successfully complete the treatment AND actively participate in  12-STEP GROUPS as part of their aftercare.  ("Success" is measured as uninterrupted sobriety for one year).  Treatment followed by therapy or counseling alone has exceedingly poor outcomes — around 2% to 4%.  The causal variable seems to be Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous or similar self-help groups. Keep in mind that the 30% positive outcome is from the ENTIRE population, 20% of which would be voluntary clients.  So it is possible that the voluntary clients are overrepresented in the group that succeeded.  It is politically incorrect to propose a research design to measure the relative success rates of involuntary clients versus voluntary, so it will be hard to find research that measures mandated clients’ success individually.  It is bound, of course, to be lower than the 30%. Bureaucracies (in this case probation and parole) are invested into forced treatment — a form of punishment to them — and frown upon anyone shedding negative light on mandatory treatment. A good residential treatment center will use the Minnesota Model of treatment, which intertwines 12-step theory and practice with rational-emotive, cognitive-behavioral, reality therapy, or another therapuetic approach.  Counselors will use any one of these clinical approaches (depending on where the client is) while at the same time introduce the client to 12-step groups.  As a general rule, the first three "steps" are worked at the center and many residential treatment centers make a concerted effort to allow clients to attend outside AA or NA meetings to become familiar with the protocol of the meetings and get to know the members.  The idea is to do as much as one can to pass on the client from residential treatment to 12-step groups. Recovery from addiction is a lifetime endeavor.  No addict comes out of residential treatment "cured."  The best graduates exit with a few tools and the knowledge of how to apply them to stay sober on the "outside."   If they did not enter the center with the motivation to change their way of life for themselves or gain that motivation while in treatment, they leave with neither the tools or the knowledge of how to apply them. Residential treatment for substance abuse, like ALL other forms of social intervention, will not be effective unless the client believes they have a problem and directly participates in setting goals in his treatment plans. This is just as true in family interventions.  The clients must be invested in the need for the services and actively construct along with the clinician or worker the treatment or safety plan that will lead to solving the client’s problems.  If the client does not believe he has a problem or has not participated in working on the plan for solving it, the intervention is doomed to failure. The exceptions residential treatment centers see are those involuntary clients who actually experience a change of mind or attitude during their stay that convinces them they DO have a problem.  Only then does treatment begin. I hope this was helpful to you, Sherman. Doug

    Response:

    "Fern5827" <fern5…@aol.com> wrote in message

    news:20040604114813.02657.00000571@mb-m28.aol.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Contraception is an alternative. > Although this was federally litigated, years ago, it would seem prudent to > rexamine some of the constitutional issues involved. > >A civil liberties advocate said the court ruling unsealed Friday was > >"blatantly unconstitutional." > This is the USCC ruling I am referring to in ablove. > >The facts of this case and the reality of parenthood cry out for family > >planning education," she ruled. "This court believes the constitutional > >right to have children is overcome when society must bear the financial and > >everyday burden of care." > Perhaps the family should be in substance abuse treatment, inpatient. > Probably cheaper than FC for a year. > >The couple may > >choose to be sterilized at no cost to them, O’Connor ruled. > *Sterilization* is out.  How about vasectomy–the pill, Depo, IUD’s? > >If the couple violates O’Connor’s ruling, they could be jailed for contempt > >of court. > Will never happen.

    Have you any proof whatsoever that forcing someone into any type of substance abuse "treatment" has been effective? Nope, thought not. Sherman.

    Response:

    On 04 Jun 2004 15:48:13 GMT, fern5…@aol.com (Fern5827) wrote: …more babbling… Never underestmate the complete obtuseness of A Tomato. There’s one of Daisy’s Doozies in this Post. >Contraception is an alternative.

    Yeah like there will be a monitor dropping by for family fun hour to check. (No, this isn’t the Doozie) >Although this was federally litigated, years ago, it would seem prudent to >rexamine some of the constitutional issues involved.

    (close, but no Cigar) >>A civil liberties advocate said the court ruling unsealed Friday was >>"blatantly unconstitutional." >This is the USCC ruling I am referring to in ablove.

    I can’t believe how much detail you included. R R R R >>The facts of this case and the reality of parenthood cry out for family >>planning education," she ruled. "This court believes the constitutional >>right to have children is overcome when society must bear the financial and >>everyday burden of care." >Perhaps the family should be in substance abuse treatment, inpatient.

    Last I heard was that that too is unconstitutional to order. And besides, most druggies not only sail through these as social hour, but love getting clean to lower their tolerance to drugs for a better cheaper high. >Probably cheaper than FC for a year.

    Not if you count the cost to the children that are there for when dadda or mamma gets hinkey from lack of Binkie. >>The couple may >>choose to be sterilized at no cost to them, O’Connor ruled. >*Sterilization* is out.  How about vasectomy–the pill, Depo, IUD’s?

    (Did yah catch it folks…"sterilization" is out but vasectomy is just fine. Do we have a sexist here, or what?..course I’ve not figure out The Plant’s sex yet. Some plants have sexual parts all on the same plant, sometimes in the same flower.) Plantlife….do you know what vasectomy does? Or would it have to be, to satisfy you, castration with removal of all extrenal genitalia as in the Harems of old? >>If the couple violates O’Connor’s ruling, they could be jailed for contempt >>of court. >Will never happen.

    We once said slavery’s end would never happen. And that women would never get the vote, have birth control available, and who would have thought the religious right, with all their loonie toons weirdness would be coming into such power as we see today in this country? Never say never….. Kane

    Response:

    Contraception is an alternative. Although this was federally litigated, years ago, it would seem prudent to rexamine some of the constitutional issues involved. >A civil liberties advocate said the court ruling unsealed Friday was >"blatantly unconstitutional."

    This is the USCC ruling I am referring to in ablove. >The facts of this case and the reality of parenthood cry out for family >planning education," she ruled. "This court believes the constitutional >right to have children is overcome when society must bear the financial and >everyday burden of care."

    Perhaps the family should be in substance abuse treatment, inpatient. Probably cheaper than FC for a year. >The couple may >choose to be sterilized at no cost to them, O’Connor ruled.

    *Sterilization* is out.  How about vasectomy–the pill, Depo, IUD’s? >If the couple violates O’Connor’s ruling, they could be jailed for contempt >of court.

    Will never happen.

    Response:

    "ROCHESTER, New York (AP) — A couple has been ordered not to conceive any more children until the ones they already have are no longer in foster care. A civil liberties advocate said the court ruling unsealed Friday was "blatantly unconstitutional." Monroe County Family Court Judge Marilyn O’Connor ruled March 31 that both parents "should not have yet another child which must be cared for at public expense." "The facts of this case and the reality of parenthood cry out for family planning education," she ruled. "This court believes the constitutional right to have children is overcome when society must bear the financial and everyday burden of care." The judge is not forcing contraception on the couple nor is she requiring the mother to get an abortion should she become pregnant. The couple may choose to be sterilized at no cost to them, O’Connor ruled. If the couple violates O’Connor’s ruling, they could be jailed for contempt of court. "I don’t know of any precedent that would permit a judge to do this," Anna Schissel, staff attorney for the Reproductive Rights Project of the New York Civil Liberties Union, told the Democrat and Chronicle of Rochester. "And even if there were a precedent, it would be blatantly unconstitutional because it violates the United States Constitution and the New York Constitution." Neither parent attended the proceeding or secured legal representation. The mother waived her right to a lawyer, and the father never showed up in court. The mother was found to have neglected her four children, ages 1, 2, 4 and 5. All three children who were tested for cocaine tested positive, according to court papers. Both parents had a history of drug abuse. It was not immediately clear if the father had other children. A case worker testified that the parents ignored an order to get mental health treatment and attend parenting classes after the 1-year-old was born. The mother was still in the hospital after giving birth to her fourth child in March 2003 when authorities took the infant, according to court papers. Investigators said the mother was unprepared to care for the infant. Attempts to reach the youngest child’s guardian were unsuccessful. Information on the other children’s guardians was not immediately available. Attorney Chris Affronti, who chairs the family law section of the Monroe County Bar Association, said he’s not sure how the ruling could be enforced. "I think what the judge is trying to do is kind of have a wake-up call for society," he said." It’ll get overturned on appeal by some liberal judge somewhere, but its what the country needs.  Its common for mothers that have had their children removed by the state to become immediately pregnant again, in order to replace the removed child or children.  Never thinking that the child was removed for a reason such as inability to care for it, or abuse.  I believe that its an emotional or self-esteem issue.  These individuals believe that having a child means that someone, one person, actually loves them unconditionally.  And of course the state knows that they are still unable to properly care for children, and again take it.  That’s how these parents get to having 8 children in the system, all taken one at a time. It took major balls for that judge to issue that order.  With luck he won’t be the last.  Maybe there is hope for us after all. Ron

    Response:

    ROCHESTER, New York (AP) — A couple has been ordered not to conceive any more children until the ones they already have are no longer in foster care. A civil liberties advocate said the court ruling unsealed Friday was "blatantly unconstitutional." Monroe County Family Court Judge Marilyn O’Connor ruled March 31 that both parents "should not have yet another child which must be cared for at public expense." "The facts of this case and the reality of parenthood cry out for family planning education," she ruled. "This court believes the constitutional right to have children is overcome when society must bear the financial and everyday burden of care." The judge is not forcing contraception on the couple nor is she requiring the mother to get an abortion should she become pregnant. The couple may choose to be sterilized at no cost to them, O’Connor ruled. If the couple violates O’Connor’s ruling, they could be jailed for contempt of court. "I don’t know of any precedent that would permit a judge to do this," Anna Schissel, staff attorney for the Reproductive Rights Project of the New York Civil Liberties Union, told the Democrat and Chronicle of Rochester. "And even if there were a precedent, it would be blatantly unconstitutional because it violates the United States Constitution and the New York Constitution." Neither parent attended the proceeding or secured legal representation. The mother waived her right to a lawyer, and the father never showed up in court. The mother was found to have neglected her four children, ages 1, 2, 4 and 5. All three children who were tested for cocaine tested positive, according to court papers. Both parents had a history of drug abuse. It was not immediately clear if the father had other children. A case worker testified that the parents ignored an order to get mental health treatment and attend parenting classes after the 1-year-old was born. The mother was still in the hospital after giving birth to her fourth child in March 2003 when authorities took the infant, according to court papers. Investigators said the mother was unprepared to care for the infant. Attempts to reach the youngest child’s guardian were unsuccessful. Information on the other children’s guardians was not immediately available. Attorney Chris Affronti, who chairs the family law section of the Monroe County Bar Association, said he’s not sure how the ruling could be enforced. "I think what the judge is trying to do is kind of have a wake-up call for society," he said.

    Response:


  • hi ho hi ho

    Question:

    well folkses…i shall join the ranks of those many middle aged people (goddess i’m old) who are returning to school.  i have been accepted into the college of arts and sciences at the university here.  i begin sept 8.   *sigh*  now begins my adventure into debt load. naomi

    Response:

    Congratulations!!  Welcome to the debt ridden ranks of middle aged students!!! Kc

    well folkses…i shall join the ranks of those many middle aged people

    (goddess i’m old) who are returning to school.  i have been accepted into the college of arts and sciences at the university here.  i begin sept 8. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – *sigh*  now begins my adventure into debt load. naomi

    Response:

    good for you! azure

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – well folkses…i shall join the ranks of those many middle aged people (goddess i’m old) who are returning to school. i have been accepted into the college of arts and sciences at the university here.  i begin sept 8. *sigh*  now begins my adventure into debt load. naomi

    Response:

    Hey Naomi! Congratulations!  Yep you’ll end up owing $$$ but you will gain riches in many other ways. :)  Way to go! marbet

    well folkses…i shall join the ranks of those many middle aged people

    (goddess i’m old) who are returning to school.  i have been accepted into the college of arts and sciences at the university here.  i begin sept 8. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – *sigh*  now begins my adventure into debt load. naomi

    Response:

    Congratulations Naomi!!!!!!  I know it’s the best decision "I" every made <G Panther

    well folkses…i shall join the ranks of those many middle aged people

    (goddess i’m old) who are returning to school.  i have been accepted into the college of arts and sciences at the university here.  i begin sept 8. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – *sigh*  now begins my adventure into debt load. naomi

    Response:

    well folkses…i shall join the ranks of those many middle aged people (goddess i’m old) who are returning to school.  i have been accepted into the college of arts and sciences at the university here.  i begin sept 8. *sigh*  now begins my adventure into debt load. naomi

    congrats naomi … always good to sharpen the mind with Whet Dreams …:)

    Response:

    well folkses…i shall join the ranks of those many middle aged people

    (goddess i’m old) who are returning to school.  i have been accepted into the college of arts and sciences at the university here.  i begin sept 8. *sigh*  now begins my adventure into debt load.

    Ah, screw the debt, you can figure that out later.  Congratulations, Naomi! Jean – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – naomi

    Response:

    well folkses…i shall join the ranks of those many middle aged people

    (goddess i’m old) who are returning to school.  i have been accepted into the college of arts and sciences at the university here.  i begin sept 8. *sigh*  now begins my adventure into debt load.

    Ah, yes.  Sometimes called "maltuition".  :)} Been there, done that, well worth the effort.  Go gal! :) } – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – naomi

    Response:

    well folkses…i shall join the ranks of those many middle aged people (goddess i’m old) who are returning to school.  i have been accepted into the college of arts and sciences at the university here.  i begin sept 8.  

    Well, congratulations.  What’ll you be studying? Baba Yaga *sigh*  now begins my adventure into debt load. naomi

    – The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them: inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehood and errors.  - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826

    Response:

    Naomi! How wonderful! What are you going to concentrate on? Are you just beginning,…. restarting…… finishing? Not that it matters in the least, the great thing is to BE doing it! Best, and don’t stay up to late studying ;-) jeeco

    well folkses…i shall join the ranks of those many middle aged

    people (goddess i’m old) who are returning to school.  i have been accepted into the college of arts and sciences at the university here. i begin sept 8. *sigh*  now begins my adventure into debt load. naomi

    – For more information about this NNTP posting service, contact: If you want an anonymous account, visit our sign-up page: https://asarian-host.net/cgi-bin/signup.cgi

    Response:

    well folkses…i shall join the ranks of those many middle aged people (goddess i’m old) who are returning to school.  i have been accepted into the college of arts and sciences at the university here.  i begin sept 8.   Well, congratulations.  What’ll you be studying? Baba Yaga

    arts with psych major…then onto clinical psych post grad work…i hope. *sigh*  now begins my adventure into debt load. naomi


  • What I Did On My Holidays (and ramblings beyond)

    Question:

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – , and doesn’t ask what I can’t do.  Or find a use which asks what I can offer, I’m not fussy. ;-) What I am fussy about, I do *not* want more failure to my account.  It’s all very well telling myself that failure’s informative, but it risks being a set-up.  Done too much of that; it’s long gone time to change the pattern. i should have read through before hitting send. bow, arrow, bullseye.  one has to mix equal parts of valor and prudence. for example, if one is quiet and shy, aspiring for a job as a restaurant greeter is not a good idea.  and if one gets flustered easily, believing one could serve at a busy switchboard is downright silly.

    Hark! it is the Voice of Bitter Experience. 8-( i say this because there are people who, in the guise of encouragement, discourage realism.  and energy wasted aiming for the stars could bring fruit in aiming a little closer to home. aspiring to an unrealistic goal is a bit like Tina getting into Ike’s car. it’s almost like obeying a subliminal command given by our abusers.  and why would they want us to succeed, and escape them?

    Heh, there are those types.  Seems as if you’ve met too many. 8-( /me tries to remember that the type doesn’t encompass the *entirety* of the psychiatric professions.  Heck, it was a student psychiatric nurse got me out to the farm, and that was a good and Helpful thing. Admittedly, it’d have been better and more helpful about 13 years earlier, but yer can’t have everything, and I don’t know whether such a thing was then possible. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Ach, damnit, I want to be useful until I kick the bucket.  & damnit if it’s officially work, so long as I know it means something.  I’m never going to be rich, anyway. exactly, exactly, exactly.  you took these words right out of my heart. feeling useful is much better i think. Me too.  8-) It’s what I’ve been aiming at, when I was aiming at anything at all, since I was about 16, and "careers" suddenly came into view.  Never had a clue what I wanted to do, or could, but I knew I wanted to be useful. <<grin  When I was in the bin, I made myself highly unpopular in the O.T. department by pointing out that the things they wanted me to do were useless.  The downstairs wards were being painted at the time – I’d have been a model patient, given a paintbrush.  I don’t suppose health and safety rules allow for such goings on, however! hey, don’t knock "useless" work.  at least it gets you into the realm of things that really exist.  i imagine that working with leather, cloth, etc. — things that were tangible — was a good antidote for the shadows and specters in people’s minds.  and an accomplishment that one can point to, can dissipate a lot of failure.

    Ahh, well…. I’ve seen good (at least reasonable) O.T. since.  There are certainly some for whom it’s very, very helpful. And yes, I’d have been quite happy to learn wood-carving, or possibly even silk-painting, or some other such new-fangled invention ;-) .  I’d have been downright chuffed at a chance to play an energetic, if totally incometent, game of ping-pong or badminton, for that matter – there was a great sports hall which went almost entirely unused. But to produce that which is neither useful nor decorative, and which neither requires nor imparts any skill – bah! humbug!  To be dragged away from my knitting, which was both moderately useful and in some sense decorative, to produce that which was *dangerous* (oven gloves pre-tacked to insufficient wadding, renamed "glove puppets", but still so obviously oven gloves that if anyone used them for anything, it’d be that) – I was underwhelmed, and said so. Our ancestors were – patchily – more enlightened than we, in that respect: there were prison and asylum gardens, even farms, and work for all but the very maddest or most dangerous.  Occupation, exercise, rehabilitation, and source of a wholesome diet all in one.  Probably exploitative, in modern terms, but there was value in it. The two productive things which *were offered there (‘though as I left for the last time, the two youthful o.t.s were trying  to get something more interesting going for the younger and less defeated patients) were relaxation classes (great, as a general principle: ghastly in particular, because they were compulsory – and increased my stress levels, until the point at which I ran away in considerable disarray and nothing was said about my returning) and literacy and numeracy classes.  I’d have enjoyed that part, had the "pupils" not been poor broken-down souls (er, like me, yes), who mistook every "tutor" for staff, and every member of staff for a therapist.  I hadn’t the defences against compassion or against my own echoing pain, to survive it.  I’m not sure I have them now. That *is* a possible line for exploration, ‘though.  Just not in a loony bin! /me makes note to find out more.  And another not to make rash decisions *right* now. besides, i often wished they’d let me work with leather during my brief stint in the loonie bin.  several times in my life i’ve wanted to do things with leather, and hadn’t a clue.  they gave me freedom to walk the vast wooded grounds, which i appreciated, but work with my hands would have helped.

    Heh, I take the point.  That was certainly the theory; if only the practice had lived up to it. and i don’t think the painters working on the building could be counted on to be good company for a patient, frankly.  when i was in the LB i was a bit thin-skinned.

    Heh.  Could be.  Contrariwise, they’d be very real, and surprisingly often the rough diamonds *are* diamonds; especially if they recognise a willingness to get on with things.  I’m at all not sure that they’d be worse company than my fellow loonies, who soon worked out that I suffered from an excess of compassion, and would listen to their harrowing tales. As it was, the best afternoon I had of it was watching the local hospitals’ XI play cricket against some village team.  That cricket ground has since been replaced by cramped, ticky-tacky houses, and that once-spacious place is now overshadowed on every side (but the main road) by the rotten, ugly, unhomey things.  But I hope a few trees remain in the grounds, to shelter squirrels and drop shinybrown conkers for those who look. Baba Yaga — People who claim to be neutral soon show which side they are neutral on.  - Eric Berne

    Response:

    It could very well be that I still haven’t really taken in the fact that *I* have to make the moves in my life, and that I *haven’t done all I can. this leaped out at me.  Pow!  right between the eyes.

    Heh.  Just now, I’m left wondering, how I can have put so much work in, and come such a long way – and still have so much more to do?  I can’t believe I’ve fought, and fought, and fought, and changed myself beyond recognition – and sworn I’d do no *more surgery on my Self – and the job’s not even begun. <<sits back, steeples hand, and looks over top of (slightly grubby) spectacles  That is, of course, the depressive position. The practical position is, get back into good habits of sleeping, and eating, and exercising, and so forth – all of which seem to have gone west lately -, and then change something, anything about the rest of my life.  If that don’t work, try changing something else. So I’m frittering time and a migraine which is already quite unpleasant enough on the computer.  Very constructive! Insight can be a curse. ;-) i think you and me have a lot in common.

    M-hm. Baba Yaga — People who claim to be neutral soon show which side they are neutral on.  - Eric Berne

    Response:

    shit.  i *really* should think through what i say, before i hit "send." this below was meant in a very specific way toward very specific people in my life, who have pushed me toward *unrealistically* high goals.  (and who have insisted that these goals were realistic and if i did not believe in them, i was being lazy or negative or whatever.)  This can be a passive-aggressive way of sabotaging a person who does not have enough confidence to insist on setting their own goals using their own sense of what is possible for them.  i did not mean to imply that the same motive is present when anyone praises anyone else’s gifts and suggests high goals for them. azure, removing foot from mouth

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – bow, arrow, bullseye.  one has to mix equal parts of valor and prudence. for example, if one is quiet and shy, aspiring for a job as a restaurant greeter is not a good idea.  and if one gets flustered easily, believing one could serve at a busy switchboard is downright silly. i say this because there are people who, in the guise of encouragement, discourage realism.  and energy wasted aiming for the stars could bring fruit in aiming a little closer to home. aspiring to an unrealistic goal is a bit like Tina getting into Ike’s car. it’s almost like obeying a subliminal command given by our abusers.  and why would they want us to succeed, and escape them?

    Response:

    It could very well be that I still haven’t really taken in the fact that *I* have to make the moves in my life, and that I *haven’t done all I can.

    this leaped out at me.  Pow!  right between the eyes. i think you and me have a lot in common. azure

    Response:

    , and doesn’t ask what I can’t do.  Or find a use which asks what I can offer, I’m not fussy. ;-) What I am fussy about, I do *not* want more failure to my account.  It’s all very well telling myself that failure’s informative, but it risks being a set-up.  Done too much of that; it’s long gone time to change the pattern.

    i should have read through before hitting send. bow, arrow, bullseye.  one has to mix equal parts of valor and prudence. for example, if one is quiet and shy, aspiring for a job as a restaurant greeter is not a good idea.  and if one gets flustered easily, believing one could serve at a busy switchboard is downright silly. i say this because there are people who, in the guise of encouragement, discourage realism.  and energy wasted aiming for the stars could bring fruit in aiming a little closer to home. aspiring to an unrealistic goal is a bit like Tina getting into Ike’s car. it’s almost like obeying a subliminal command given by our abusers.  and why would they want us to succeed, and escape them? Ach, damnit, I want to be useful until I kick the bucket.  & damnit if it’s officially work, so long as I know it means something.  I’m never going to be rich, anyway.

    exactly, exactly, exactly.  you took these words right out of my heart. feeling useful is much better i think. Me too.  8-) It’s what I’ve been aiming at, when I was aiming at anything at all, since I was about 16, and "careers" suddenly came into view.  Never had a clue what I wanted to do, or could, but I knew I wanted to be useful. <<grin  When I was in the bin, I made myself highly unpopular in the O.T. department by pointing out that the things they wanted me to do were useless.  The downstairs wards were being painted at the time – I’d have been a model patient, given a paintbrush.  I don’t suppose health and safety rules allow for such goings on, however!

    hey, don’t knock "useless" work.  at least it gets you into the realm of things that really exist.  i imagine that working with leather, cloth, etc. — things that were tangible — was a good antidote for the shadows and specters in people’s minds.  and an accomplishment that one can point to, can dissipate a lot of failure. besides, i often wished they’d let me work with leather during my brief stint in the loonie bin.  several times in my life i’ve wanted to do things with leather, and hadn’t a clue.  they gave me freedom to walk the vast wooded grounds, which i appreciated, but work with my hands would have helped. and i don’t think the painters working on the building could be counted on to be good company for a patient, frankly.  when i was in the LB i was a bit thin-skinned. azure

    Response:

    alt.abuse.recovery: Dear Baba Yaga, You are a gloriously talented writer. Your insignts into the human condition very smart. This is obviously something you enjoy. Don’t think I’m being ridiculous to point out something so obvious, but… – Watson, out

    Thank you!  With all this ego-fodder, I’ll be able to resist all comers, if ever I decide to write a book. Communication’s the thing I enjoy – along with getting pieces into the puzzle.  Maybe you’re right, ‘though – maybe there’s some way I haven’t considered, of turning that to account.  In this internet age, there ought to be. Baba Yaga — People who claim to be neutral soon show which side they are neutral on.  - Eric Berne

    Response:

    As mostly, below are ramblings more for me own benefit (stops the tendency to go in circles) than any other reason.  Input always welcome, but not expected or required. Well, since you wrote it twice – thank’ee, m’am – I will, too. only because you wrote it twice.

    Oh, yes, so I did.  <<grin unsolicited advice: And very good advice, too. I’m in the market for anything which moves me on a bit.  ’Though I’ll stop long enough to compain before moving, if a kick in the arse is what does it.  (I’m suspecting self-kicking – purely in a spirit of impelling forward motion – may be the proper caper; takes a little practice to do it without falling flat on my face, however.) aim low.  that way you’ll end up on your butt rather than on your face.  the padding is generally better.

    Good point.  Very good point, actually. Falling on one’s butt is *backwards motion, ‘though… ;-) any house-sharing possibilities?  or is that too difficult for you?

    Probably a very bad move, I think – but worth keeping in mind in case it *becomes* a better move.  Or I’m wrong. I’m pretty sure I’ve done all I can usefully, or sensibly, do on that front for now.  However, that may change – it may just be that the balance between "want to be gone" and "like comfort" has only gone so far.  It could very well be that I still haven’t really taken in the fact that *I* have to make the moves in my life, and that I *haven’t done all I can.  In that case, either I’ll return to this conversation and make use of it, at a point when I’m better up to acting (relatively) judiciously than right now, or else I’ll deserve what I get for sitting on my arse. Otherwise, and anyway, – I must find useful occupation. are you saying that you have difficulty sustaining the effort or motivation for a full 16 hours a week?  

    Yup, whichever of those it is.  Ability to outrun my own terror, maybe.  But my stamina is improving, and I think it’s doing that faster since I decided Everest was a bit ambitious for a beginner (so to say). It’s better, I think, where I’m least afraid of letting people down. That’s the *other great disadvantage of paid employment, besides that it’s not so flexible; it’s doubly a bad thing to let someone down who’s paying for the privilege. you said you had work awaiting you there.  what kind of work?

    First obvious bet is as general helper at humane and enlightened project for dementing people – not that I have a clue whether I can do that sort of thing without causing chaos/ cracking up, but if anywhere, there, so it’s worth trying.  Next bet is envelope-stuffer, organdiser of paints, felt-tips, & wotnots, and otherwise doer of useful nothings for charity wot runs said project.  & next is, oh damn, back to where I began, with slightly more idea of where not to look next time, and slightly more scope in the way of possibilities than I have here. There are (I checked with the volunteer bureau there, a year or more back) numerous other things I might try, too, a rather greater variety of things than in this town full of the comfortable retired: it just happens that that one comes on a plate, has some kind of meaning, could be adjusted (within reason) to suit me, and fits nicely with my social circle.  Somehow, I’ve got to work out what I *actually* have to offer, and what use I can turn it to, which means enough to get me up the Hill Difficulty which stands at the beginning of all new enterprises, and doesn’t ask what I can’t do.  Or find a use which asks what I can offer, I’m not fussy. ;-) What I am fussy about, I do *not* want more failure to my account. It’s all very well telling myself that failure’s informative, but it risks being a set-up.  Done too much of that; it’s long gone time to change the pattern. Ach, damnit, I want to be useful until I kick the bucket.  & damnit if it’s officially work, so long as I know it means something.  I’m never going to be rich, anyway. feeling useful is much better i think.

    Me too.  8-) It’s what I’ve been aiming at, when I was aiming at anything at all, since I was about 16, and "careers" suddenly came into view.  Never had a clue what I wanted to do, or could, but I knew I wanted to be useful. <<grin  When I was in the bin, I made myself highly unpopular in the O.T. department by pointing out that the things they wanted me to do were useless.  The downstairs wards were being painted at the time – I’d have been a model patient, given a paintbrush.  I don’t suppose health and safety rules allow for such goings on, however! funny, from what you write here and elsewhere, you’ve always struck me as a fairly competent person.  these posts seem to suggest you don’t believe that of yourself.

    No. I admire folk like Polly Wog – she walks her walk.  I talk a lot about walking. Baba Yaga — People who claim to be neutral soon show which side they are neutral on.  - Eric Berne

    Response:

    Dear Baba Yaga, You are a gloriously talented writer. Your insignts into the human condition very smart. This is obviously something you enjoy. Don’t think I’m being ridiculous to point out something so obvious, but… – Watson, out

    Response:

    Well, since you wrote it twice – thank’ee, m’am – I will, too.

    only because you wrote it twice. unsolicited advice: And very good advice, too. I’m in the market for anything which moves me on a bit.  ’Though I’ll stop long enough to compain before moving, if a kick in the arse is what does it.  (I’m suspecting self-kicking – purely in a spirit of impelling forward motion – may be the proper caper; takes a little practice to do it without falling flat on my face, however.)

    aim low.  that way you’ll end up on your butt rather than on your face.  the padding is generally better. give it a try. have a coming-out party. ?!  Coming-out?

    of retirement. put retirement house in mothballs until retirement.  better yet, rent it to a retired couple or anyone else who wants it.  get a property manager to deal with renters. Oh lord, if only.  I’d be long gone! Sadly, ’twas a case of my meaning one thing (glorified retirement home = ossifying town where I live, not me little flat), and saying another.  Options so far as I can see are private rent (which seems only theoretically to be an option, for all the usual reasons) and social housing – which only becomes an option when (or, at ghastliest, if) either I climb up the housing list, or someone living in social housing where I want to live decides that he wants to live in social housing where I do live.

    ah.  okay. any house-sharing possibilities?  or is that too difficult for you? I’ve been considering what they call "low-demand housing", which (as my housing officer here informed me) means that you wouldn’t put a dog in there, as a stopgap.  Unfortunately, I can’t work out how I’d get *out of it once in, short of complete crack-up – and it ain’t certain, even then.  Eager as I am to be gone, I’d rather avoid going the loony-bin route.

    doesn’t sound like stopgap if it doesn’t have a stop. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -get up and get on train. move. take work. live. play. live. play. live. play. eventually retire. or not. Not sounds pretty good, just now.  Which for someone who’s still not up to the minimum 16 hours a week it takes (at least, around here) to become a shelf-stacker [it ain't meaningful, but it *is uncomplicated], is a pretty good sign of under-occupation.  <<grin

    are you saying that you have difficulty sustaining the effort or motivation for a full 16 hours a week?  you said you had work awaiting you there.  what kind of work? Ach, damnit, I want to be useful until I kick the bucket.  & damnit if it’s officially work, so long as I know it means something.  I’m never going to be rich, anyway.

    feeling useful is much better i think. funny, from what you write here and elsewhere, you’ve always struck me as a fairly competent person.  these posts seem to suggest you don’t believe that of yourself. — astri

    Response:

    alt.abuse.recovery: Enjoy your week together, Baba Yaga.

    Thank you, James. 8-) I trust you’re well? And yes, I’ve been saying nasty things behind your back, though not having anything to do with you.  Does that count?

    I think you know my general opinion about that; & I think I’ve laboured the point enough.  But I’m enormously relieved to hear you haven’t been saying them about me. ;-) Baba Yaga — The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them: inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehood and errors.  - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826

    Response:

    Sweet Evil Jesus Baba. You are a brilliant, engaging writer. Sorry for top posting but I couldn’t bear to snip and I didn’t want to do the long scroll down thing for my unsubstantial remarks.  I loved this post, read it twice. Work?  You’re a gifted writer.  That may be your destiny. Jean

    Thank you, Jean.  You’re always good for my ego – and I love your way of expressing yourself.  Who but you would come up with "Sweet Evil Jesus"? So far as writing goes – I hope not, I’d have to be disciplined, and edit, and, and, research things! ;-)  Or d’you think I could get an opinion slot in one of the dailies, spouting off the way I do here? ;-) Baba grinning mightily — The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them: inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehood and errors.  - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826

    Response:

    Ooh!  I’ve enticed tigerbunny out of the warrens of the jungle. <<beam alt.abuse.recovery: I second astri’s idea to get a property manager and rent the place out.  Tell yourself you can go back.

    Heh.  That’s not bad psychology.  Although I’m pretty sure going back wouldn’t be an option, even if were in a position to.  I hated  this town when I was dragged here, too depressed and too bloody compliant to do anything but acquiesce, 18 years ago, and although it’s actually a very nice place in many ways, and although I’ve learnt a sort of affection for it just as you do by getting to know a person’s quirks, I’ve been wanting out for a long while.  Moving is vastly overdue. It was useful to have (or partly, to find out that I had) something to go *to, to make me do something about it.  So I’ve been all impetus for the past so long, dressed up for the ball and – no invitation. ;-) (I’m half-way to my three-score and ten, for gawd’s sake, I need work.  Not quite knowing how much I can do – & having a habit of crashing out through overestimating – is a pest.   boy, can I relate to that.  I never know it’s too far until I’m there :P

    Oh, dear.  It’s probably a victim/ survivor thing. 8-P  Think we’ll ever learn? I’d settle for becoming more resilient – a mere week suspended in the garage while a grease-monkey tinkers with my engine would be a nuisance, but liveable with. Not to mention that I don’t have an awful lot to offer, even in theory, which isn’t negated by my weaknesses. You might be surprised to find that you do.  I’m constantly amazed at what other people think is wonderful.  Talents are things we don’t know we have until sumbunny else points them out.  

    True.  & if it weren’t for you people here, I might never have learnt I had *any* sort of talents.  I have much to be thankful for. If we didn’t *learn* it, how can it be valuable?  

    Hmmm.  And then there are those who reason it in precisely the opposite direction – if it doesn’t come naturally, it can’t *really* be valuable. I just look at things wot need doing, or which people want done, and generally find that either I’d be completely hopeless (which is fine, so long as it doesn’t encompass every possible occupation under the sun), or else that I could do that bit and that bit, but I’d fall flat on my face when it came to *that bit – never mind mediocre, it’d be a disaster.  Sometimes I find that bit out by doing it.  I can dig, tho’, in an unscientific manner, and once upon a time I was pretty good at bottling lambs and rolling fleeces, not to mention Useful Arm-Waving when the shepherds were moving sheep.  Thank god, one needs no social skills or um, presence, or wotnot, to do those things.  One just does ‘em.  There ain’t much left in the world of which that’s true. My brother doesn’t value his amazing skill with wood, because he doesn’t understand that everybunny cannot do that.  I didn’t value my organizing/filing ability until I learned that there are (many!) people who cannot do that.  They pay me lots to do it for ‘em. ;)

    Point taken.  Anyway, you’re yourself, and whenever I see your nick, I know I’m going to find something worth reading.  8-) And anything which requires initiative, or anything which can be judged on any grounds more complicated than having done what had to be done, scares the shit out of me.   I keep telling people (at my office and really, anyone who will sit still) that I’m thrilled, even though I find it a terribly sad thing, that, for the first time in my life, I’m working at the very edge of my ability.  

    /me sits still & unfolds her lugs for better listening. Wonderful for you. 8-)  I think I remember you writing about working always within your abilities, a time back; sort of philosophically. And if it’s late, you’re no less there now.  Some people spend their whole lives in the comfort zone of something they care nothing about, and which doesn’t fit at all, and isn’t really comfortable, except that they’ve been there so long they’ve worn a groove.  A great many people. Still, for now, *I’d be happy to stay in my comfort zone.  I absolutely don’t want to be at the edge of my abilities; I spend too much time there just in the natural course of things, and being terrified takes a lot of energy.  So, I want to do something I *can do, and where I know what needs doing, and just build my stamina up, and let my nervous system find out what not being terrified is like. Then I can decide whether I want to find out the good of being at the edge of one’s abilities. What I’m doing requires all my attention.  I’ve never in my 43 years done anything like that. (well, maybe learning to walk as a child ;)  It’s gawdawful, meaningless, stoopid work, but I’m fully engaged.  It’s interesting (to be engaged – not the work).  And I’m okay with doing the best I can, and working without being a master of it.  Just plain weird for me.

    It sounds like the right thing for the time.  Healthy.  And I’m all for being engaged. But I’m damned if I’m going to beat myself up over the fact, however much other people disapprove.   Not that you need it, but I totally approve of you not beating up yourself. :)  I said to one of my minions yesterday – I was so glad to know him.  He reminds me of the wild life I lived when I was younger, and I’m not sorry.  Many people told me I should be doing other things, but I did as I pleased, and I’m not sorry.

    I didn’t, and I am. 8-P You are wonderful and refreshing.  Thank you. wishing you a lovely visit with your mystery guest, and adding my influence to the weather clerk for your clear skies,

    Your contribution much appreciated – he’s been generous with sun so far.  And I’m enjoying, and I think the mystery guest is enjoying herself.  (Only mysterious ’cause I keep forgetting to ask permission to mention, except when she isn’t here to be asked.) Baba Yaga — The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them: inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehood and errors.  - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826

    Response:

    Well, since you wrote it twice – thank’ee, m’am – I will, too. unsolicited advice:

    And very good advice, too. I’m in the market for anything which moves me on a bit.  ’Though I’ll stop long enough to compain before moving, if a kick in the arse is what does it.  (I’m suspecting self-kicking – purely in a spirit of impelling forward motion – may be the proper caper; takes a little practice to do it without falling flat on my face, however.) give it a try. have a coming-out party.

    ?!  Coming-out? put retirement house in mothballs until retirement.  better yet, rent it to a retired couple or anyone else who wants it.  get a property manager to deal with renters.

    Oh lord, if only.  I’d be long gone! Sadly, ’twas a case of my meaning one thing (glorified retirement home = ossifying town where I live, not me little flat), and saying another.  Options so far as I can see are private rent (which seems only theoretically to be an option, for all the usual reasons) and social housing – which only becomes an option when (or, at ghastliest, if) either I climb up the housing list, or someone living in social housing where I want to live decides that he wants to live in social housing where I do live. I’ve been considering what they call "low-demand housing", which (as my housing officer here informed me) means that you wouldn’t put a dog in there, as a stopgap.  Unfortunately, I can’t work out how I’d get *out of it once in, short of complete crack-up – and it ain’t certain, even then.  Eager as I am to be gone, I’d rather avoid going the loony-bin route. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -get up and get on train. move. take work. live. play. live. play. live. play. eventually retire. or not.

    Not sounds pretty good, just now.  Which for someone who’s still not up to the minimum 16 hours a week it takes (at least, around here) to become a shelf-stacker [it ain't meaningful, but it *is uncomplicated], is a pretty good sign of under-occupation.  <<grin Ach, damnit, I want to be useful until I kick the bucket.  & damnit if it’s officially work, so long as I know it means something.  I’m never going to be rich, anyway. Baba Yaga — The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them: inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehood and errors.  - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826

    Response:

    Sweet Evil Jesus Baba. You are a brilliant, engaging writer. Sorry for top posting but I couldn’t bear to snip and I didn’t want to do the long scroll down thing for my unsubstantial remarks.  I loved this post, read it twice. Work?  You’re a gifted writer.  That may be your destiny. Jean

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – First, let us establish something important: I have been away.  I hope you all noticed that.  And if I find out that any of you have been saying nasty things behind my back, there’ll be trouble. Or nice things.  I want you to say them to my face, damnit!  Lots of them! ‘Hem.  As I was saying, I have been away.  Actually, I ran away, in a blue funk, but we’ll draw a veil over that. So, I get up at an unearthly hour on what turns into a perfect spring day, spend several hours on trains, fairly ripping through some lovely country, and the obligatory stretches of urban wasteland and get to Glasgow, where my friend meets me.  Considering that a few years ago, the half hour journey to the nearest town would knock me sideways, I’m doing pretty well!  And I’m nicely in time for a truly superb (and cheap) lunch at the Shish Mahal restaurant.  (Just in case anyone ever wants to know where to find good grub in Glasgow.) Follows a bumpy, trip through the Trossachs (which look, should you be wondering, just you’d imagine as Trossachs should), with an unintended detour to Loch Lomond.  & not much remains of the evening, except that there must have been one. Come the morning, I’m drowsing in a tousled heap under the quilt, when a hand bearing a cup appears round the door, followed by my friend, who’s lustily singing, "Away, away, you ugly witch".  (His excuse is that he’s been listening to Steeleye Span.  A likely story, I call it.) A springlike week of holiday following, we trundle out around the surrounding countryside, and laze about rather a lot, and listen to music.  & when the dreaded lurgy strikes us down, more lazing follows. So, I find myself slouched on the sofa with my friend, and watching the snooker (a billiards-type game, should our overseas readers be wondering).  It’s round about now that he starts singing "Can’t you see the witch by my side?" Anyroad up, I’m struck by the discipline this game requires…  Not just hours of practice, but an awesome degree of emotional control. & in particular, I get to watching Graham Dott.  [Them as haven't a clue what I'm talking about may fast forward to the next para.]  For one thing, tactical play is interesting (especially with someone by who understands the game well enough to illuminate what my ignorance can’t see!); for another, he’s a fascinating mannerism, where he thrusts his chin forward in a motion a bit like a bird gulping for a passing insect; and for an important third, he’s a gritty little character.  Coming back, and coming back, frame after frame, and this astonishing control, so that he never gives up, never gets carried away by the situation.  He’s not the most talented player (so much was apparent even before the final), but that determination & level-headedness raised him above himself. There’s something to be learned from, there, I think.  Especially for so volatile and so unsteady a creature as me! More lazing, more music, and a hilarious (and touching) evening out, at which my friend and his siblings got to reminiscing…  Their memories are glorious technicolour, quite remarkable.  And we laughed fit to bust. It’s almost trite to remark the link between tragedy and comedy.  It’s striking, ‘though, to watch the process in action.  The difference is in the view…  Detachment is a thing to be cultivated.  It’s the mark of the adult person, in many ways.  <<sigh  Not but what some folk cultivate it too well… Perhaps, come to think of it, detachment is a large part of what enables a snooker player to have the sort of self-dscipline to survive the game a week. At some point, my friend changes song again, to "Separate the torso from the spine".  I decide that it’s time to book my ticket home. And so, with a dealine prodding my laziness into action, I get around to meeting up with a couple of friends who live nearby – and not meeting up with another, on account of children’s social lives.  I want to move!  It’s ridiculous to have friends – active, purposeful friends, people whom I like and respect and enjoy – scattered about an area, and work waiting for me to boot; and instead *still to be living in the glorified retirement home my parents dropped me into when I was 16, minus sufficient useful occupation. (I’m half-way to my three-score and ten, for gawd’s sake, and I’m still living a life defined by the disaster I was when I was 19.  On bad days, I have an uneasy suspicion I’m still waiting for someone to do it – whatever precisely it is – for me, as I obediently did for years, until some brave and kind soul told me he couldn’t, and freed me at least to start for myself.  Time to do something about that, I think!) Home, to such delights as freshening up the kitchen paintwork, picking up other people’s litter, and retrieving traffic cones from the river, and a general dispirited feeling.  I need work.  Not quite knowing how much I can do – & having a habit of crashing out through overestimating – is a pest.  Not to mention that I don’t have an awful lot to offer, even in theory, which isn’t negated by my weaknesses. But I *do* know that whatever I do needs to be meaningful to me, not just generally a good thing, & I do know that I’m not bad at playing unskilled labourer, so that’s something.  Anything wot requires more brawn (not that I’ve got much of that, but I’ve got stubbornness to make up for the lack) than brain suits me fine. And anything which requires initiative, or anything which can be judged on any grounds more complicated than having done what had to be done, scares the shit out of me.  But I’m damned if I’m going to beat myself up over the fact, however much other people disapprove.  I’ve done enough surgery on myself for one lifetime: from now on, likely reward has to match effort; and so far, that isn’t directly a priority.  Time and events may or may not change that. Anyroad, as this turns into totally a different post from what I expected, tomorrow a person whom some people here know is coming to stay for a week, so that promises fun.  All the more so if the clerk of the weather co-operates. 8-) <<fizzle Baba Yaga — The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them: inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehood and errors.  - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826

    Response:

    Oh Baba!  Wot a lovely story :) If I can’t have a holiday of my own, I do enjoy other people’s. Or nice things.  I want you to say them to my face, damnit!  Lots of them!

    Keep reading ;) I want to move!  It’s ridiculous to have friends – active, purposeful friends, people whom I like and respect and enjoy – scattered about an area, and work waiting for me to boot; and instead *still to be living in the glorified retirement home my parents dropped me into when I was 16, minus sufficient useful occupation.

    I second astri’s idea to get a property manager and rent the place out.  Tell yourself you can go back. (I’m half-way to my three-score and ten, for gawd’s sake,

    I need work.  Not quite knowing how much I can do – & having a habit of crashing out through overestimating – is a pest.  

    boy, can I relate to that.  I never know it’s too far until I’m there :P Not to mention that I don’t have an awful lot to offer, even in theory, which isn’t negated by my weaknesses.

    You might be surprised to find that you do.  I’m constantly amazed at what other people think is wonderful.  Talents are things we don’t know we have until sumbunny else points them out.  If we didn’t *learn* it, how can it be valuable?  My brother doesn’t value his amazing skill with wood, because he doesn’t understand that everybunny cannot do that.  I didn’t value my organizing/filing ability until I learned that there are (many!) people who cannot do that.  They pay me lots to do it for ‘em. ;) And anything which requires initiative, or anything which can be judged on any grounds more complicated than having done what had to be done, scares the shit out of me.  

    I keep telling people (at my office and really, anyone who will sit still) that I’m thrilled, even though I find it a terribly sad thing, that, for the first time in my life, I’m working at the very edge of my ability.  What I’m doing requires all my attention.  I’ve never in my 43 years done anything like that. (well, maybe learning to walk as a child ;)  It’s gawdawful, meaningless, stoopid work, but I’m fully engaged.  It’s interesting (to be engaged – not the work).  And I’m okay with doing the best I can, and working without being a master of it.  Just plain weird for me. But I’m damned if I’m going to beat myself up over the fact, however much other people disapprove.  

    Not that you need it, but I totally approve of you not beating up yourself. :)  I said to one of my minions yesterday – I was so glad to know him.  He reminds me of the wild life I lived when I was younger, and I’m not sorry.  Many people told me I should be doing other things, but I did as I pleased, and I’m not sorry. wishing you a lovely visit with your mystery guest, and adding my influence to the weather clerk for your clear skies, tigerbunny

    Response:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – First, let us establish something important: I have been away.  I hope you all noticed that.  And if I find out that any of you have been saying nasty things behind my back, there’ll be trouble. Or nice things.  I want you to say them to my face, damnit!  Lots of them! ‘Hem.  As I was saying, I have been away.  Actually, I ran away, in a blue funk, but we’ll draw a veil over that. So, I get up at an unearthly hour on what turns into a perfect spring day, spend several hours on trains, fairly ripping through some lovely country, and the obligatory stretches of urban wasteland and get to Glasgow, where my friend meets me.  Considering that a few years ago, the half hour journey to the nearest town would knock me sideways, I’m doing pretty well!  And I’m nicely in time for a truly superb (and cheap) lunch at the Shish Mahal restaurant.  (Just in case anyone ever wants to know where to find good grub in Glasgow.) Follows a bumpy, trip through the Trossachs (which look, should you be wondering, just you’d imagine as Trossachs should), with an unintended detour to Loch Lomond.  & not much remains of the evening, except that there must have been one. Come the morning, I’m drowsing in a tousled heap under the quilt, when a hand bearing a cup appears round the door, followed by my friend, who’s lustily singing, "Away, away, you ugly witch".  (His excuse is that he’s been listening to Steeleye Span.  A likely story, I call it.) A springlike week of holiday following, we trundle out around the surrounding countryside, and laze about rather a lot, and listen to music.  & when the dreaded lurgy strikes us down, more lazing follows. So, I find myself slouched on the sofa with my friend, and watching the snooker (a billiards-type game, should our overseas readers be wondering).  It’s round about now that he starts singing "Can’t you see the witch by my side?" Anyroad up, I’m struck by the discipline this game requires…  Not just hours of practice, but an awesome degree of emotional control. & in particular, I get to watching Graham Dott.  [Them as haven't a clue what I'm talking about may fast forward to the next para.]  For one thing, tactical play is interesting (especially with someone by who understands the game well enough to illuminate what my ignorance can’t see!); for another, he’s a fascinating mannerism, where he thrusts his chin forward in a motion a bit like a bird gulping for a passing insect; and for an important third, he’s a gritty little character.  Coming back, and coming back, frame after frame, and this astonishing control, so that he never gives up, never gets carried away by the situation.  He’s not the most talented player (so much was apparent even before the final), but that determination & level-headedness raised him above himself. There’s something to be learned from, there, I think.  Especially for so volatile and so unsteady a creature as me! More lazing, more music, and a hilarious (and touching) evening out, at which my friend and his siblings got to reminiscing…  Their memories are glorious technicolour, quite remarkable.  And we laughed fit to bust. It’s almost trite to remark the link between tragedy and comedy.  It’s striking, ‘though, to watch the process in action.  The difference is in the view…  Detachment is a thing to be cultivated.  It’s the mark of the adult person, in many ways.  <<sigh  Not but what some folk cultivate it too well… Perhaps, come to think of it, detachment is a large part of what enables a snooker player to have the sort of self-dscipline to survive the game a week. At some point, my friend changes song again, to "Separate the torso from the spine".  I decide that it’s time to book my ticket home. And so, with a dealine prodding my laziness into action, I get around to meeting up with a couple of friends who live nearby – and not meeting up with another, on account of children’s social lives.  I want to move!  It’s ridiculous to have friends – active, purposeful friends, people whom I like and respect and enjoy – scattered about an area, and work waiting for me to boot; and instead *still to be living in the glorified retirement home my parents dropped me into when I was 16, minus sufficient useful occupation. (I’m half-way to my three-score and ten, for gawd’s sake, and I’m still living a life defined by the disaster I was when I was 19.  On bad days, I have an uneasy suspicion I’m still waiting for someone to do it – whatever precisely it is – for me, as I obediently did for years, until some brave and kind soul told me he couldn’t, and freed me at least to start for myself.  Time to do something about that, I think!) Home, to such delights as freshening up the kitchen paintwork, picking up other people’s litter, and retrieving traffic cones from the river, and a general dispirited feeling.  I need work.  Not quite knowing how much I can do – & having a habit of crashing out through overestimating – is a pest.  Not to mention that I don’t have an awful lot to offer, even in theory, which isn’t negated by my weaknesses. But I *do* know that whatever I do needs to be meaningful to me, not just generally a good thing, & I do know that I’m not bad at playing unskilled labourer, so that’s something.  Anything wot requires more brawn (not that I’ve got much of that, but I’ve got stubbornness to make up for the lack) than brain suits me fine. And anything which requires initiative, or anything which can be judged on any grounds more complicated than having done what had to be done, scares the shit out of me.  But I’m damned if I’m going to beat myself up over the fact, however much other people disapprove.  I’ve done enough surgery on myself for one lifetime: from now on, likely reward has to match effort; and so far, that isn’t directly a priority.  Time and events may or may not change that. Anyroad, as this turns into totally a different post from what I expected, tomorrow a person whom some people here know is coming to stay for a week, so that promises fun.  All the more so if the clerk of the weather co-operates. 8-) <<fizzle Baba Yaga

    unsolicited advice: give it a try. have a coming-out party. put retirement house in mothballs until retirement.  better yet, rent it to a retired couple or anyone else who wants it.  get a property manager to deal with renters. get up and get on train. move. take work. live. play. live. play. live. play. eventually retire. or not. — astri

    Response:

    Enjoy your week together, Baba Yaga. And yes, I’ve been saying nasty things behind your back, though not having anything to do with you.  Does that count?

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -First, let us establish something important: I have been away.  I hope you all noticed that.  And if I find out that any of you have been saying nasty things behind my back, there’ll be trouble. Or nice things.  I want you to say them to my face, damnit!  Lots of them! ‘Hem.  As I was saying, I have been away.  Actually, I ran away, in a blue funk, but we’ll draw a veil over that. So, I get up at an unearthly hour on what turns into a perfect spring day, spend several hours on trains, fairly ripping through some lovely country, and the obligatory stretches of urban wasteland and get to Glasgow, where my friend meets me.  Considering that a few years ago, the half hour journey to the nearest town would knock me sideways, I’m doing pretty well!  And I’m nicely in time for a truly superb (and cheap) lunch at the Shish Mahal restaurant.  (Just in case anyone ever wants to know where to find good grub in Glasgow.) Follows a bumpy, trip through the Trossachs (which look, should you be wondering, just you’d imagine as Trossachs should), with an unintended detour to Loch Lomond.  & not much remains of the evening, except that there must have been one. Come the morning, I’m drowsing in a tousled heap under the quilt, when a hand bearing a cup appears round the door, followed by my friend, who’s lustily singing, "Away, away, you ugly witch".  (His excuse is that he’s been listening to Steeleye Span.  A likely story, I call it.) A springlike week of holiday following, we trundle out around the surrounding countryside, and laze about rather a lot, and listen to music.  & when the dreaded lurgy strikes us down, more lazing follows. So, I find myself slouched on the sofa with my friend, and watching the snooker (a billiards-type game, should our overseas readers be wondering).  It’s round about now that he starts singing "Can’t you see the witch by my side?" Anyroad up, I’m struck by the discipline this game requires…  Not just hours of practice, but an awesome degree of emotional control. & in particular, I get to watching Graham Dott.  [Them as haven't a clue what I'm talking about may fast forward to the next para.]  For one thing, tactical play is interesting (especially with someone by who understands the game well enough to illuminate what my ignorance can’t see!); for another, he’s a fascinating mannerism, where he thrusts his chin forward in a motion a bit like a bird gulping for a passing insect; and for an important third, he’s a gritty little character.  Coming back, and coming back, frame after frame, and this astonishing control, so that he never gives up, never gets carried away by the situation.  He’s not the most talented player (so much was apparent even before the final), but that determination & level-headedness raised him above himself. There’s something to be learned from, there, I think.  Especially for so volatile and so unsteady a creature as me! More lazing, more music, and a hilarious (and touching) evening out, at which my friend and his siblings got to reminiscing…  Their memories are glorious technicolour, quite remarkable.  And we laughed fit to bust. It’s almost trite to remark the link between tragedy and comedy.  It’s striking, ‘though, to watch the process in action.  The difference is in the view…  Detachment is a thing to be cultivated.  It’s the mark of the adult person, in many ways.  <<sigh  Not but what some folk cultivate it too well… Perhaps, come to think of it, detachment is a large part of what enables a snooker player to have the sort of self-dscipline to survive the game a week. At some point, my friend changes song again, to "Separate the torso from the spine".  I decide that it’s time to book my ticket home. And so, with a dealine prodding my laziness into action, I get around to meeting up with a couple of friends who live nearby – and not meeting up with another, on account of children’s social lives.  I want to move!  It’s ridiculous to have friends – active, purposeful friends, people whom I like and respect and enjoy – scattered about an area, and work waiting for me to boot; and instead *still to be living in the glorified retirement home my parents dropped me into when I was 16, minus sufficient useful occupation. (I’m half-way to my three-score and ten, for gawd’s sake, and I’m still living a life defined by the disaster I was when I was 19.  On bad days, I have an uneasy suspicion I’m still waiting for someone to do it – whatever precisely it is – for me, as I obediently did for years, until some brave and kind soul told me he couldn’t, and freed me at least to start for myself.  Time to do something about that, I think!) Home, to such delights as freshening up the kitchen paintwork, picking up other people’s litter, and retrieving traffic cones from the river, and a general dispirited feeling.  I need work.  Not quite knowing how much I can do – & having a habit of crashing out through overestimating – is a pest.  Not to mention that I don’t have an awful lot to offer, even in theory, which isn’t negated by my weaknesses. But I *do* know that whatever I do needs to be meaningful to me, not just generally a good thing, & I do know that I’m not bad at playing unskilled labourer, so that’s something.  Anything wot requires more brawn (not that I’ve got much of that, but I’ve got stubbornness to make up for the lack) than brain suits me fine. And anything which requires initiative, or anything which can be judged on any grounds more complicated than having done what had to be done, scares the shit out of me.  But I’m damned if I’m going to beat myself up over the fact, however much other people disapprove.  I’ve done enough surgery on myself for one lifetime: from now on, likely reward has to match effort; and so far, that isn’t directly a priority.  Time and events may or may not change that. Anyroad, as this turns into totally a different post from what I expected, tomorrow a person whom some people here know is coming to stay for a week, so that promises fun.  All the more so if the clerk of the weather co-operates. 8-) <<fizzle Baba Yaga

    Response:

    First, let us establish something important: I have been away.  I hope you all noticed that.  And if I find out that any of you have been saying nasty things behind my back, there’ll be trouble. Or nice things.  I want you to say them to my face, damnit!  Lots of them! ‘Hem.  As I was saying, I have been away.  Actually, I ran away, in a blue funk, but we’ll draw a veil over that. So, I get up at an unearthly hour on what turns into a perfect spring day, spend several hours on trains, fairly ripping through some lovely country, and the obligatory stretches of urban wasteland and get to Glasgow, where my friend meets me.  Considering that a few years ago, the half hour journey to the nearest town would knock me sideways, I’m doing pretty well!  And I’m nicely in time for a truly superb (and cheap) lunch at the Shish Mahal restaurant.  (Just in case anyone ever wants to know where to find good grub in Glasgow.) Follows a bumpy, trip through the Trossachs (which look, should you be wondering, just you’d imagine as Trossachs should), with an unintended detour to Loch Lomond.  & not much remains of the evening, except that there must have been one. Come the morning, I’m drowsing in a tousled heap under the quilt, when a hand bearing a cup appears round the door, followed by my friend, who’s lustily singing, "Away, away, you ugly witch".  (His excuse is that he’s been listening to Steeleye Span.  A likely story, I call it.) A springlike week of holiday following, we trundle out around the surrounding countryside, and laze about rather a lot, and listen to music.  & when the dreaded lurgy strikes us down, more lazing follows. So, I find myself slouched on the sofa with my friend, and watching the snooker (a billiards-type game, should our overseas readers be wondering).  It’s round about now that he starts singing "Can’t you see the witch by my side?" Anyroad up, I’m struck by the discipline this game requires…  Not just hours of practice, but an awesome degree of emotional control. & in particular, I get to watching Graham Dott.  [Them as haven't a clue what I'm talking about may fast forward to the next para.]  For one thing, tactical play is interesting (especially with someone by who understands the game well enough to illuminate what my ignorance can’t see!); for another, he’s a fascinating mannerism, where he thrusts his chin forward in a motion a bit like a bird gulping for a passing insect; and for an important third, he’s a gritty little character.  Coming back, and coming back, frame after frame, and this astonishing control, so that he never gives up, never gets carried away by the situation.  He’s not the most talented player (so much was apparent even before the final), but that determination & level-headedness raised him above himself. There’s something to be learned from, there, I think.  Especially for so volatile and so unsteady a creature as me! More lazing, more music, and a hilarious (and touching) evening out, at which my friend and his siblings got to reminiscing…  Their memories are glorious technicolour, quite remarkable.  And we laughed fit to bust. It’s almost trite to remark the link between tragedy and comedy.  It’s striking, ‘though, to watch the process in action.  The difference is in the view…  Detachment is a thing to be cultivated.  It’s the mark of the adult person, in many ways.  <<sigh  Not but what some folk cultivate it too well… Perhaps, come to think of it, detachment is a large part of what enables a snooker player to have the sort of self-dscipline to survive the game a week. At some point, my friend changes song again, to "Separate the torso from the spine".  I decide that it’s time to book my ticket home. And so, with a dealine prodding my laziness into action, I get around to meeting up with a couple of friends who live nearby – and not meeting up with another, on account of children’s social lives.  I want to move!  It’s ridiculous to have friends – active, purposeful friends, people whom I like and respect and enjoy – scattered about an area, and work waiting for me to boot; and instead *still to be living in the glorified retirement home my parents dropped me into when I was 16, minus sufficient useful occupation. (I’m half-way to my three-score and ten, for gawd’s sake, and I’m still living a life defined by the disaster I was when I was 19.  On bad days, I have an uneasy suspicion I’m still waiting for someone to do it – whatever precisely it is – for me, as I obediently did for years, until some brave and kind soul told me he couldn’t, and freed me at least to start for myself.  Time to do something about that, I think!) Home, to such delights as freshening up the kitchen paintwork, picking up other people’s litter, and retrieving traffic cones from the river, and a general dispirited feeling.  I need work.  Not quite knowing how much I can do – & having a habit of crashing out through overestimating – is a pest.  Not to mention that I don’t have an awful lot to offer, even in theory, which isn’t negated by my weaknesses. But I *do* know that whatever I do needs to be meaningful to me, not just generally a good thing, & I do know that I’m not bad at playing unskilled labourer, so that’s something.  Anything wot requires more brawn (not that I’ve got much of that, but I’ve got stubbornness to make up for the lack) than brain suits me fine. And anything which requires initiative, or anything which can be judged on any grounds more complicated than having done what had to be done, scares the shit out of me.  But I’m damned if I’m going to beat myself up over the fact, however much other people disapprove.  I’ve done enough surgery on myself for one lifetime: from now on, likely reward has to match effort; and so far, that isn’t directly a priority.  Time and events may or may not change that. Anyroad, as this turns into totally a different post from what I expected, tomorrow a person whom some people here know is coming to stay for a week, so that promises fun.  All the more so if the clerk of the weather co-operates. 8-) <<fizzle Baba Yaga — The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them: inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehood and errors.  - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826

    Response:


  • where i've been

    Question:

    Hi there hayley – I’m sorry to hear you’ve gone through such a rough patch, and glad you’re feeling a bit better.  Be really gentle with yourself right now, and do what you have to to keep safe.  I’ll think good thoughts for you. Katherine

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Ok so heres the situation..(and this is cross posted between alt.abuse.recovery and alt.support self-harm and I apologise for the length..it just got longer and longer) Social worker is due on a routine visit to me, on a tuesday morning…. It’s a week before the anniversary of pauls death, so I’m in a bit of a tizz…am sort of ok though….I get talking to social worker about how I am feeling, which is basically pretty crap.  Then I don’t really remember what happens, apart from going into the kitchen with her for some reason, picking up a Stanley knife and slicing my arm, right in front of her…blood everywhere and social worker trying her best to mop it up….me doesn’t feel anything….total blankness….. me is in a right old state…social worker apparently calls colleagues as does not know what to do…me remembers saying will not hurt social worker, (and I’ve never hurt anyone in my life) but is intent on getting knife back to slash self with…me goes into kitchen again I think to get knife… social worker calls ambulance….me remembers two of her colleagues arriving in a hurry,…then me is carted off in ambulance….during ambulance journey me eats diazepam in bag whilst paramedic is jotting down notes….me the remembers nothing until finds self on a psychiatric ward.  Me is pleased that is safe at last, and is in voluntarily…..Annevsary of pauls death is getting closer…so on the Friday me decides wants to go and lie on the railways tracks, so packs up belongings and tells nurse am leaving.  Nurse doesn’t let me, tells me a doctor needs to discharge me.  Me trys to leave again and is restrained by nurses.  Friend visits whilst me is waiting for doctor to discharge me. Me trys to jump out of window (and if anyone knows what a psych window is like you will know there is a bar preventing it being opened more then 4 inches) me gets leg stuck.  Nurses have to pull leg out of window.  Doctor arrives…doesn’t think I am sane and sections me one 5.2 (72 hours methinks)  me trys to leave again..books a taxi and escapes through door..make it to bottom of stairs until nurses catch me on the cctv and forcibly takes me back to the ward.  Me smashes a cup and slashes arm, opening up old wounds.  Me locks self in toilet….me being a bit dim doesn’t realise they can be opened from outside very easily.  Nurses put me on 5 minute checks.  72 hours is nearly up… GP and Approved social worker visit…. Tell them  I plan on dying (which is stupid really)  section 2 then happens….me I still on 5 minute checks in safe room.  Day before anniversary of pauls death.  me tries to drown self in bath…being on 5 minute checks only manage to get into bath (fully clothed for some odd reason) and put head under water for a short while until nurses find me, and give me a bollocking, telling me to take my wet jeans off. me tells them want to get pneumonia.  nurses say not to be so silly and leave for 5 minutes. me is put on chlorpromazine and is promptly sedated…sedation wears off…me rips up sheet and attempts to strangle self with sheet….me only succeeds in passing out before nurses find me (those darn 5 minute checks again)  anniversary of pauls death..me is sedated so doesn’t remember anything…April 8th he died……me attempts to smash window but only succeed in bouncing off it (they told me that but I thought I’d try and see) time continues, and as it goes by things become a little easier…..only mange to self harm once using iron, which is promptly locked away for use only by other more sane patients.  So comes last Wednesday….me is a loot more sane and not having plans to go and lie on railway tracks.. doc agrees to trust me on an outing with dad…outing goes ok…still have odd thoughts but am ok…doc agrees to lift section, and arranges leave for Friday and Saturday night.. leave goes well…me tells housemates where have been for past couple of weeks..housemates sympathetic….me goes back to the hospital for Sunday night, have some lorazepam and borrow my friends teddy bear for the night, but am ok to be discharged Monday, on a bucketful of meds.  Me has meeting tuesday (today) with doc, cpn, social worker, ex dbt therapist and day hospital worker…. social worker only agrees to see me one more time, at day hospital in  a weeks time (and I cant say I blame her after what happened last time I saw her)  don’t really needs cpn anymore.  Might be able to restart DBT depends on what response they get from other people, got to wait until 3 weeks to find out whether can start it again.  Day hospital bloke will work with me on working up to telling me housemates I self harm, as social worker and cpn have been to legal team and can legally tell them, as I am such a risk to myself.  Doc says do I want to see her within next 3 weeks..me says no will wait..doc says me can get meds from GP as I request….me needs to see them about asthma getting worse anyhow to will make it a double apt…me also needs yet another bloody smear test as another borderline result…me is bloody nervous as hate them anyhow, cause of the abuse and crap and now is the time of year when the abuse first started..me is also embarrassed about what have done to legs and doc seeing it….me can’t explain how the words the beast must die became carved into legs..cant say I have a very nasty cat this time..a very literate cat at that (and a very very vicious one to cause such bad scarring) me is all in a tizz again, so is writing this to try and let some of it out…right now its 16.29 on tuesday and me is waffling…me needed to tell someone about this so is posting it to ng’s. All in all it’s been a nightmare few weeks..a real living nightmare… I wanted to go to the crematorium up in Birmingham on the day he died but the nurses wouldn’t let me go.. I still want to go, and I have a friend who will go with me..it’s just actually going… I’m scared I might loose it again and be sectioned…whilst I am sad right now I am not mad (as posting to a ng and using the internet will verify) I am scared of loosing my sanity…the meds help, but there’s always that risk with me… im scared that I might take the tablets I have… I don’t want to die…. I really don’t….but sometimes the urge to kill myself strikes me and I cant control what I do.. I got into automatic… I only have 5 days worth of meds at the moment so I cant do any damage really, and im not intending on taking them, im also planning on only getting a weeks worth of meds from my docs at a time..but I know me, I will con my doc into giving me more…so I might categorically state when I go only ever to give me a weeks worth at a time..that way I cant store them up or anything..there’s no real risk of me not taking them, as they help me… I also plan on getting rid of my aspirin and paracetomol stash.. I have enough to kill about 5 people, and I don’t feel comfortable having them round, so I might just now go and get them and flush them away, just so they are not there…. well this must have bored everyone to tears.. my hats off to you if you have read this far… I just needed to get this off my chest….I might post more later,  but for now im going to go and make something to eat (ive been starving myself for the last few days) as im feeling a bit funny (one can not survive on pepsi max) that’s all for now take care hayley

    Response:

    I’m glad for the watchfulness of those health professionals, and somewhat dismayed by your determination to make an exit. I hope you will remain in this plane. Peace and strength, Tide Rider

    | Ok so heres the situation..(and this is cross posted between | alt.abuse.recovery and alt.support self-harm and I apologise for the | length..it just got longer and longer) | | Social worker is due on a routine visit to me, on a tuesday morning…. It’s | a week before the anniversary of pauls death, so I’m in a bit of a tizz…am | sort of ok though….I get talking to social worker about how I am feeling, | which is basically pretty crap.  Then I don’t really remember what happens, | apart from going into the kitchen with her for some reason, picking up a | Stanley knife and slicing my arm, right in front of her…blood everywhere | and social worker trying her best to mop it up….me doesn’t feel | anything….total blankness….. me is in a right old state…social worker | apparently calls colleagues as does not know what to do…me remembers | saying will not hurt social worker, (and I’ve never hurt anyone in my life) | but is intent on getting knife back to slash self with…me goes into | kitchen again I think to get knife… social worker calls ambulance….me | remembers two of her colleagues arriving in a hurry,…then me is carted off | in ambulance….during ambulance journey me eats diazepam in bag whilst | paramedic is jotting down notes….me the remembers nothing until finds self | on a psychiatric ward.  Me is pleased that is safe at last, and is in | voluntarily…..Annevsary of pauls death is getting closer…so on the | Friday me decides wants to go and lie on the railways tracks, so packs up | belongings and tells nurse am leaving.  Nurse doesn’t let me, tells me a | doctor needs to discharge me.  Me trys to leave again and is restrained by | nurses.  Friend visits whilst me is waiting for doctor to discharge me.  Me | trys to jump out of window (and if anyone knows what a psych window is like | you will know there is a bar preventing it being opened more then 4 inches) | me gets leg stuck.  Nurses have to pull leg out of window.  Doctor | arrives…doesn’t think I am sane and sections me one 5.2 (72 hours | methinks)  me trys to leave again..books a taxi and escapes through | door..make it to bottom of stairs until nurses catch me on the cctv and | forcibly takes me back to the ward.  Me smashes a cup and slashes arm, | opening up old wounds.  Me locks self in toilet….me being a bit dim | doesn’t realise they can be opened from outside very easily.  Nurses put me | on 5 minute checks.  72 hours is nearly up… GP and Approved social worker | visit…. Tell them  I plan on dying (which is stupid really)  section 2 | then happens….me I still on 5 minute checks in safe room.  Day before | anniversary of pauls death.  me tries to drown self in bath…being on 5 | minute checks only manage to get into bath (fully clothed for some odd | reason) and put head under water for a short while until nurses find me, and | give me a bollocking, telling me to take my wet jeans off. me tells them | want to get pneumonia.  nurses say not to be so silly and leave for 5 | minutes. me is put on chlorpromazine and is promptly sedated…sedation | wears off…me rips up sheet and attempts to strangle self with sheet….me | only succeeds in passing out before nurses find me (those darn 5 minute | checks again)  anniversary of pauls death..me is sedated so doesn’t remember | anything…April 8th he died……me attempts to smash window but only | succeed in bouncing off it (they told me that but I thought I’d try and see) | time continues, and as it goes by things become a little easier…..only | mange to self harm once using iron, which is promptly locked away for use | only by other more sane patients.  So comes last Wednesday….me is a loot | more sane and not having plans to go and lie on railway tracks.. doc agrees | to trust me on an outing with dad…outing goes ok…still have odd thoughts | but am ok…doc agrees to lift section, and arranges leave for Friday and | Saturday night.. leave goes well…me tells housemates where have been for | past couple of weeks..housemates sympathetic….me goes back to the hospital | for Sunday night, have some lorazepam and borrow my friends teddy bear for | the night, but am ok to be discharged Monday, on a bucketful of meds.  Me | has meeting tuesday (today) with doc, cpn, social worker, ex dbt therapist | and day hospital worker…. social worker only agrees to see me one more | time, at day hospital in  a weeks time (and I cant say I blame her after | what happened last time I saw her)  don’t really needs cpn anymore.  Might | be able to restart DBT depends on what response they get from other people, | got to wait until 3 weeks to find out whether can start it again.  Day | hospital bloke will work with me on working up to telling me housemates I | self harm, as social worker and cpn have been to legal team and can legally | tell them, as I am such a risk to myself.  Doc says do I want to see her | within next 3 weeks..me says no will wait..doc says me can get meds from GP | as I request….me needs to see them about asthma getting worse anyhow to | will make it a double apt…me also needs yet another bloody smear test as | another borderline result…me is bloody nervous as hate them anyhow, cause | of the abuse and crap and now is the time of year when the abuse first | started..me is also embarrassed about what have done to legs and doc seeing | it….me can’t explain how the words the beast must die became carved into | legs..cant say I have a very nasty cat this time..a very literate cat at | that (and a very very vicious one to cause such bad scarring) me is all in a | tizz again, so is writing this to try and let some of it out…right now its | 16.29 on tuesday and me is waffling…me needed to tell someone about this | so is posting it to ng’s. | | All in all it’s been a nightmare few weeks..a real living nightmare… I | wanted to go to the crematorium up in Birmingham on the day he died but the | nurses wouldn’t let me go.. I still want to go, and I have a friend who will | go with me..it’s just actually going… I’m scared I might loose it again | and be sectioned…whilst I am sad right now I am not mad (as posting to a | ng and using the internet will verify) I am scared of loosing my | sanity…the meds help, but there’s always that risk with me… im scared | that I might take the tablets I have… I don’t want to die…. I really | don’t….but sometimes the urge to kill myself strikes me and I cant control | what I do.. I got into automatic… I only have 5 days worth of meds at the | moment so I cant do any damage really, and im not intending on taking them, | im also planning on only getting a weeks worth of meds from my docs at a | time..but I know me, I will con my doc into giving me more…so I might | categorically state when I go only ever to give me a weeks worth at a | time..that way I cant store them up or anything..there’s no real risk of me | not taking them, as they help me… I also plan on getting rid of my aspirin | and paracetomol stash.. I have enough to kill about 5 people, and I don’t | feel comfortable having them round, so I might just now go and get them and | flush them away, just so they are not there…. | | well this must have bored everyone to tears.. my hats off to you if you have | read this far… I just needed to get this off my chest….I might post more | later,  but for now im going to go and make something to eat (ive been | starving myself for the last few days) as im feeling a bit funny (one can | not survive on pepsi max) | | that’s all for now | | take care | | hayley | |

    Response:

    It’s a week before the anniversary of pauls death, so I’m in a bit of a tizz…am sort of ok though

    reach inside with your compassion Hayley … hold yourself inside where the hurt is … comfort yourself in your pain and tears inside like you were the best mom rushing to a little child doing all the right stuff while the healing takes place. sumbuddie luvs ya … ya know. :)

    Response:

    Ok so heres the situation..(and this is cross posted between alt.abuse.recovery and alt.support self-harm and I apologise for the length..it just got longer and longer) Social worker is due on a routine visit to me, on a tuesday morning…. It’s a week before the anniversary of pauls death, so I’m in a bit of a tizz…am sort of ok though….I get talking to social worker about how I am feeling, which is basically pretty crap.  Then I don’t really remember what happens, apart from going into the kitchen with her for some reason, picking up a Stanley knife and slicing my arm, right in front of her…blood everywhere and social worker trying her best to mop it up….me doesn’t feel anything….total blankness….. me is in a right old state…social worker apparently calls colleagues as does not know what to do…me remembers saying will not hurt social worker, (and I’ve never hurt anyone in my life) but is intent on getting knife back to slash self with…me goes into kitchen again I think to get knife… social worker calls ambulance….me remembers two of her colleagues arriving in a hurry,…then me is carted off in ambulance….during ambulance journey me eats diazepam in bag whilst paramedic is jotting down notes….me the remembers nothing until finds self on a psychiatric ward.  Me is pleased that is safe at last, and is in voluntarily…..Annevsary of pauls death is getting closer…so on the Friday me decides wants to go and lie on the railways tracks, so packs up belongings and tells nurse am leaving.  Nurse doesn’t let me, tells me a doctor needs to discharge me.  Me trys to leave again and is restrained by nurses.  Friend visits whilst me is waiting for doctor to discharge me.  Me trys to jump out of window (and if anyone knows what a psych window is like you will know there is a bar preventing it being opened more then 4 inches) me gets leg stuck.  Nurses have to pull leg out of window.  Doctor arrives…doesn’t think I am sane and sections me one 5.2 (72 hours methinks)  me trys to leave again..books a taxi and escapes through door..make it to bottom of stairs until nurses catch me on the cctv and forcibly takes me back to the ward.  Me smashes a cup and slashes arm, opening up old wounds.  Me locks self in toilet….me being a bit dim doesn’t realise they can be opened from outside very easily.  Nurses put me on 5 minute checks.  72 hours is nearly up… GP and Approved social worker visit…. Tell them  I plan on dying (which is stupid really)  section 2 then happens….me I still on 5 minute checks in safe room.  Day before anniversary of pauls death.  me tries to drown self in bath…being on 5 minute checks only manage to get into bath (fully clothed for some odd reason) and put head under water for a short while until nurses find me, and give me a bollocking, telling me to take my wet jeans off. me tells them want to get pneumonia.  nurses say not to be so silly and leave for 5 minutes. me is put on chlorpromazine and is promptly sedated…sedation wears off…me rips up sheet and attempts to strangle self with sheet….me only succeeds in passing out before nurses find me (those darn 5 minute checks again)  anniversary of pauls death..me is sedated so doesn’t remember anything…April 8th he died……me attempts to smash window but only succeed in bouncing off it (they told me that but I thought I’d try and see) time continues, and as it goes by things become a little easier…..only mange to self harm once using iron, which is promptly locked away for use only by other more sane patients.  So comes last Wednesday….me is a loot more sane and not having plans to go and lie on railway tracks.. doc agrees to trust me on an outing with dad…outing goes ok…still have odd thoughts but am ok…doc agrees to lift section, and arranges leave for Friday and Saturday night.. leave goes well…me tells housemates where have been for past couple of weeks..housemates sympathetic….me goes back to the hospital for Sunday night, have some lorazepam and borrow my friends teddy bear for the night, but am ok to be discharged Monday, on a bucketful of meds.  Me has meeting tuesday (today) with doc, cpn, social worker, ex dbt therapist and day hospital worker…. social worker only agrees to see me one more time, at day hospital in  a weeks time (and I cant say I blame her after what happened last time I saw her)  don’t really needs cpn anymore.  Might be able to restart DBT depends on what response they get from other people, got to wait until 3 weeks to find out whether can start it again.  Day hospital bloke will work with me on working up to telling me housemates I self harm, as social worker and cpn have been to legal team and can legally tell them, as I am such a risk to myself.  Doc says do I want to see her within next 3 weeks..me says no will wait..doc says me can get meds from GP as I request….me needs to see them about asthma getting worse anyhow to will make it a double apt…me also needs yet another bloody smear test as another borderline result…me is bloody nervous as hate them anyhow, cause of the abuse and crap and now is the time of year when the abuse first started..me is also embarrassed about what have done to legs and doc seeing it….me can’t explain how the words the beast must die became carved into legs..cant say I have a very nasty cat this time..a very literate cat at that (and a very very vicious one to cause such bad scarring) me is all in a tizz again, so is writing this to try and let some of it out…right now its 16.29 on tuesday and me is waffling…me needed to tell someone about this so is posting it to ng’s. All in all it’s been a nightmare few weeks..a real living nightmare… I wanted to go to the crematorium up in Birmingham on the day he died but the nurses wouldn’t let me go.. I still want to go, and I have a friend who will go with me..it’s just actually going… I’m scared I might loose it again and be sectioned…whilst I am sad right now I am not mad (as posting to a ng and using the internet will verify) I am scared of loosing my sanity…the meds help, but there’s always that risk with me… im scared that I might take the tablets I have… I don’t want to die…. I really don’t….but sometimes the urge to kill myself strikes me and I cant control what I do.. I got into automatic… I only have 5 days worth of meds at the moment so I cant do any damage really, and im not intending on taking them, im also planning on only getting a weeks worth of meds from my docs at a time..but I know me, I will con my doc into giving me more…so I might categorically state when I go only ever to give me a weeks worth at a time..that way I cant store them up or anything..there’s no real risk of me not taking them, as they help me… I also plan on getting rid of my aspirin and paracetomol stash.. I have enough to kill about 5 people, and I don’t feel comfortable having them round, so I might just now go and get them and flush them away, just so they are not there…. well this must have bored everyone to tears.. my hats off to you if you have read this far… I just needed to get this off my chest….I might post more later,  but for now im going to go and make something to eat (ive been starving myself for the last few days) as im feeling a bit funny (one can not survive on pepsi max) that’s all for now take care hayley

    Response:


  • Off topic stuff

    Question:

    I can live with ads for Viagra.  It’s the outrageous explicitness that bugs me.

    There’s a lot on this topic to which I could respond but this was last so… What about explicitness? If one is explicit with good intent is that enough to redeem the outrageousness of it? What about sexual healing, hmmm? When I was going through that part of recovery (ongoing in a way as some of you may understand) in depth (sorry), found I couldn’t remember that kind of encounter unless I wrote it down afterward. Writing coherent sentences allowed me to know my erotic self better. Without writing I would have forgotten all or most sexual experiences. Can’t yet write the most ludicrous of my fantasies let alone speak of them and perhaps in my terrorized memory/imagination…the things are horrible indeed…is where they should remain. Sex was one of the most difficult parts of healing for me and something I think I know a thing or two about actually. I have of late perused a lot of info/support web sites that have proliferated in the last years – having recently gotten DSL which makes surfing more of a pleasure. None of them deal with that issue. There is a gap that perhaps I can and have filled with the writing I’ve done on the subject. Panther? You out there? Hmmm? It’s a tender subject for a lot of people. Personal. Too so? Dunno. Re: blogging. It meant a lot to me to have the words up on a web site – to have someone – anyone – bear witness to the process. Will say that one of the early steps in getting to orgasm was about affection; that not all affection had ulterior motives. ‘Twas painful at first. Hurt so good kinda thing. Just back from a play about love, honesty, the difference between men and women, fathers & sons & friends. Some of the people I work with were in it. They did so well. A beautiful theater. Anyway… Still thinking about what it means to fear rejection and the antidote. The antidote? Anyone? Nice spending a few with y’all. – Watson, out

    Response:

    Reposting ’cause I think this got lost in the shuffle – with a misleading subject. – Watson – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I can live with ads for Viagra.  It’s the outrageous explicitness that bugs me. There’s a lot on this topic to which I could respond but this was last so… What about explicitness? If one is explicit with good intent is that enough to redeem the outrageousness of it? What about sexual healing, hmmm? When I was going through that part of recovery (ongoing in a way as some of you may understand) in depth (sorry), found I couldn’t remember that kind of encounter unless I wrote it down afterward. Writing coherent sentences allowed me to know my erotic self better. Without writing I would have forgotten all or most sexual experiences. Can’t yet write the most ludicrous of my fantasies let alone speak of them and perhaps in my terrorized memory/imagination…the things are horrible indeed…is where they should remain. Sex was one of the most difficult parts of healing for me and something I think I know a thing or two about actually. I have of late perused a lot of info/support web sites that have proliferated in the last years – having recently gotten DSL which makes surfing more of a pleasure. None of them deal with that issue. There is a gap that perhaps I can and have filled with the writing I’ve done on the subject. It’s a tender subject for a lot of people. Personal. Too so? Dunno. Re: blogging. It meant a lot to me to have the words up on a web site – to have someone – anyone – bear witness to the process. Will say that one of the early steps in getting to orgasm was about affection; that not all affection had ulterior motives. ‘Twas painful at first. Hurt so good kinda thing. Just back from a play about love, honesty, the difference between men and women, fathers & sons & friends. Some of the people I work with were in it. They did so well. A beautiful theater. Anyway… Still thinking about what it means to fear rejection and the antidote. The antidote? Anyone? Nice spending a few with y’all. – Watson, out

    Response:

    Unless the group is moderated, the spam will come right in I think the deceiving Subject urk me the most…..like newbie here….and open to find an add for Viagra. Life is a bitch sometimes…. ivan

    * * * * * * * *.Playa Zipolite, Oaxaca, Southern Mexico….Budget/Backpackersparadise! Cabanas $5 US per night, Hammocks $1 to $3 US per night.. .Welcome to the Beach of the Dead….check it out:Ivanjay’sPlace, & Playa Zipolite

    My NEW Veracruz, Mexico Links, Updated April 2004, Webpage:http://community-2.webtv.net/GeorgeKsFriend/VeracruzMexicoLinks/

    Response:

    I can live with ads for Viagra.  It’s the outrageous explicitness that bugs me. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Unless the group is moderated, the spam will come right in I think the deceiving Subject urk me the most…..like newbie here….and open to find an add for Viagra. Life is a bitch sometimes…. ivan —

    Response:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – what is healing to one is off topic to another.  i killfile most of the political stuff because i find it boring, not living in the usa and all. that’s what a killfile is for.  i also killfile other threads that are of no interest to me.  those may be heavy discussions of healing, they may be discussions of perps, they may be about the rice in china. to be honest, there’s little that i would post here that could be "on topic" simply because that means exposing myself on a forum that’s open to all kinds of "interested" parties. *Yeah.  I don’t either, anymore.  Too many interested parties, and not just the ones online.  If I had it to do again, I would not have had an online journal. It seems foolhardy to me now to have put so much of myself out there.  Then, it felt ‘empowering’ and all that, as if it were MY story by golly, and no one was going to keep me from telling it anymore.  I have finally learned the value of discretion.

    i still keep the blog.  then again, i don’t have the fan club you do. when i do community presentations about child sexual abuse i never speak of the abuse itself.  the last thing i want to do is   titilate someone.  while many lurkers of this newsgroup are survivors of some type of abuse, i know that other lurkers are looking for a thrill. True.  I waver on this point.  Sometimes I feel like I will be darned if I will give them jack off fodder.  Other times, I feel like I’ll be darned if I’ll let them shut me up.

    i waver too.  but not usually a whole lot.  i’ll talk about how the abuse affected me, what i was like,  how hard i worked to get to where i am and all that.  at least with that i have the possibility of someone seeing that what they’re doing is causing harm (not that it’ll happen, but you never know).  the abuse itself, telling a therapist was sufficient witnessing for me.  I don’t need to evicerate myself for the public. besides, if i keep retelling about the abuse then i’d always be there.  i don’t want to be anymore.  i’ve visited that enough.  the only time i reflect on it much anymore is if i get triggered and i’m trying to figure out what happened.  otherwise my eyes are forward now…keeps me from tripping on the rocks ahead. naomi

    Response:

    what is healing to one is off topic to another.  i killfile most of the political stuff because i find it boring, not living in the usa and all.  that’s what a killfile is for.  i also killfile other threads that are of no interest to me.  those may be heavy discussions of healing, they may be discussions of perps, they may be about the rice in china.   to be honest, there’s little that i would post here that could be "on topic" simply because that means exposing myself on a forum that’s open to all kinds of "interested" parties.   when i do community presentations about child sexual abuse i never speak of the abuse itself.  the last thing i want to do is titilate someone.  while many lurkers of this newsgroup are survivors of some type of abuse, i know that other lurkers are looking for a thrill. naomi – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Then why have newsgroups at all?  Just put all messages in one group, and let everyone try to wade through the mire to find what they wanted to discuss or read about. A certain amount of topic spread is fine, but beyond that point it becomes a serious nuisance. So when is it too much?  When you can no longer FIND the on-topic posts among the garbage.  When that happens, people stop using the newsgroup for its intended topic and go elsewhere instead. Those who remember ASAR will recognize this pattern.  For that matter, there aren’t many on-topic posts here of late either… | I like (and encourage) off topic posts about politics, etc, believing that | those people who don’t want to read them are either bright enough not to do | so or so stupid I don’t care. | | The ones that are annoying me are all the spam with the graphic sexuality in | the titles.  Bad group for that. | | ~~ if you look like a duck, quack like a | duck, and waddle like a duck, you should not be angry or even surprised if | people try to slather you with orange sauce.~~  azure | |


  • intuition

    Question:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – – sharing some readings here  from The Gift of Fear by Gavin de Becker – ;) "It is a process more extraordinary and ultimately more logical in the natural order than the most fantastic computer calculation. It is our most complex cognitive process and at the same time the simplest.     Intuition connects us to the natural world and to our nature. Freed from the bonds of judgment, married only to perception, it carries us to predictions we will later marvel at." yes, you’re right.  furthermore, people can’t *prove* why they are justified in feeling fear, it’s not something they can be right or wrong about, and it’s not something that other people (especially the ones they fear) have the right to badger them about. an example of this, is the burly men who choose to pump iron and dress like outlaw bikers but are hurt and insulted when much smaller women avoid going into elevators with them.  now, these men are always able to explain why someone *should not* feel fear, because the small woman "has no way of knowing for certain what was in his head" and "cannot read minds" and therefore doesn’t have the right to be "bigoted" and refuse to get into the elevator with him.  they feel that unless that woman has spent time talking with them, and finding out what they are like, that woman does not have the right to "discriminate" against him.  that it is talking, discussion, that will dispell the "misunderstanding."  and the responsibility for this is, of course, the woman’s — the receiver of the message — and not his, the sender of the message.  it’s her duty to get into the elevator willingly with him, not his duty to stop dressing like a thug. So if a rape victim wore a low-cut blouse and short shirt, you’d allow the defense to make a statement to that effect to be made in court in mitigation? *scrolling back through the post…* Nope.  nowhere in this post did i mention anything about rape victims, low-cut blouses, short skirts, the defense, courts, etc. this was your hypothetical example, not mine.  what gave you the idea that i said anything, or meant to say anything, about such a situation at all?

    Then what is your feeling about my hypothetical example? — G.C. Note ANTI, SPAM and invalid to be removed if you’re e-mailing me.

    Response:

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – So if a rape victim wore a low-cut blouse and short shirt, you’d allow the defense to make a statement to that effect to be made in court in mitigation? *scrolling back through the post…* Nope.  nowhere in this post did i mention anything about rape victims, low-cut blouses, short skirts, the defense, courts, etc. this was your hypothetical example, not mine.  what gave you the idea that i said anything, or meant to say anything, about such a situation at all? Then what is your feeling about my hypothetical example?

    actually, at this point of time, i have no particular feeling, that i would care to discuss in this forum, about your hypothetical example. is there some reason i should? azure

    Response:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – So if a rape victim wore a low-cut blouse and short shirt, you’d allow the defense to make a statement to that effect to be made in court in mitigation? *scrolling back through the post…* Nope.  nowhere in this post did i mention anything about rape victims, low-cut blouses, short skirts, the defense, courts, etc. this was your hypothetical example, not mine.  what gave you the idea that i said anything, or meant to say anything, about such a situation at all? Then what is your feeling about my hypothetical example? actually, at this point of time, i have no particular feeling, that i would care to discuss in this forum, about your hypothetical example. is there some reason i should?

    Absolutely not duck!  I just posted a thought that came into my head. You are not obliged to have any feelings about it, nor are you obliged to discuss your feelings if you do have any. Cheers. — G.C. Note ANTI, SPAM and invalid to be removed if you’re e-mailing me.

    Response:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – is there some reason i should? Absolutely not duck!  I just posted a thought that came into my head.  You are not obliged to have any feelings about it, nor are you obliged to discuss your feelings if you do have any. Cheers. kewl! welcome to AAR. :-) azure

    Thanks. — G.C. Note ANTI, SPAM and invalid to be removed if you’re e-mailing me.

    Response:

    is there some reason i should? Absolutely not duck!  I just posted a thought that came into my head.  You are not obliged to have any feelings about it, nor are you obliged to discuss your feelings if you do have any. Cheers.

    kewl! welcome to AAR. :-) azure

    Response:

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – alt.abuse.recovery: [Azure] an example of this, is the burly men who choose to pump iron and dress like outlaw bikers but are hurt and insulted when much smaller women avoid going into elevators with them.  now, these men are always able to explain why someone *should not* feel fear, because the small woman "has no way of knowing for certain what was in his head" and "cannot read minds" and therefore doesn’t have the right to be "bigoted" and refuse to get into the elevator with him.  they feel that unless that woman has spent time talking with them, and finding out what they are like, that woman does not have the right to "discriminate" against him.  that it is talking, discussion, that will dispell the "misunderstanding."  and the responsibility for this is, of course, the woman’s — the receiver of the message — and not his, the sender of the message.  it’s her duty to get into the elevator willingly with him, not his duty to stop dressing like a thug. So if a rape victim wore a low-cut blouse and short shirt, you’d allow the defense to make a statement to that effect to be made in court in mitigation? You’re not comparing like with like. I was comparing: woman judging a man’s character from his appearance, and man judging a woman’s character from her appearance.

    You’re not comparing like with like. In the woman’s given case of judging a man, her assumption results in her stepping back and avoiding contact.  In the man’s given case of judging the woman, his assumption results in his forcing contact. The truth is, regardless of what we like or would allow, we *all make immediate assumptions about the people around us based on how they appear to us.   We are given to feel either safe or wary based on what we are presented with.  What DeBecker (and azure and Baba) is saying is that more often than not, our initial impression is right.  If we are with someone or in a situation where we feel unsafe, even if it seems irrational to us, we are best to listen to our instincts and step back until we can assess if we are safe or not.  In most situations, the only way to do that is to step back and avoid the situation altogether. Does it mean that sometimes we may unfairly judge someone by their appearance?  Could the gnarly, tattooed, bedraggled thug really be a guy with a heart of gold?  Yes – but we are under no obligation to give him the benefit of the doubt because it’s just as possible that he is a dangerous thug.  Our obligation is to take care of our own safety, even at the possible expense of someone’s hurt feeling on the chance that they may be aware of our hesitation. Iow, if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, it probably is a duck and I, for one, don’t want duck shit on the carpet.

    Response:

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – – sharing some readings here  from The Gift of Fear by Gavin de Becker – ;) "It is a process more extraordinary and ultimately more logical in the natural order than the most fantastic computer calculation. It is our most complex cognitive process and at the same time the simplest.     Intuition connects us to the natural world and to our nature. Freed from the bonds of judgment, married only to perception, it carries us to predictions we will later marvel at." yes, you’re right.  furthermore, people can’t *prove* why they are justified in feeling fear, it’s not something they can be right or wrong about, and it’s not something that other people (especially the ones they fear) have the right to badger them about. an example of this, is the burly men who choose to pump iron and dress like outlaw bikers but are hurt and insulted when much smaller women avoid going into elevators with them.  now, these men are always able to explain why someone *should not* feel fear, because the small woman "has no way of knowing for certain what was in his head" and "cannot read minds" and therefore doesn’t have the right to be "bigoted" and refuse to get into the elevator with him.  they feel that unless that woman has spent time talking with them, and finding out what they are like, that woman does not have the right to "discriminate" against him.  that it is talking, discussion, that will dispell the "misunderstanding."  and the responsibility for this is, of course, the woman’s — the receiver of the message — and not his, the sender of the message.  it’s her duty to get into the elevator willingly with him, not his duty to stop dressing like a thug. So if a rape victim wore a low-cut blouse and short shirt, you’d allow the defense to make a statement to that effect to be made in court in mitigation?

    *scrolling back through the post…* Nope.  nowhere in this post did i mention anything about rape victims, low-cut blouses, short skirts, the defense, courts, etc. this was your hypothetical example, not mine.  what gave you the idea that i said anything, or meant to say anything, about such a situation at all? azure

    Response:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – alt.abuse.recovery: [Azure] an example of this, is the burly men who choose to pump iron and dress like outlaw bikers but are hurt and insulted when much smaller women avoid going into elevators with them.  now, these men are always able to explain why someone *should not* feel fear, because the small woman "has no way of knowing for certain what was in his head" and "cannot read minds" and therefore doesn’t have the right to be "bigoted" and refuse to get into the elevator with him.  they feel that unless that woman has spent time talking with them, and finding out what they are like, that woman does not have the right to "discriminate" against him.  that it is talking, discussion, that will dispell the "misunderstanding."  and the responsibility for this is, of course, the woman’s — the receiver of the message — and not his, the sender of the message.  it’s her duty to get into the elevator willingly with him, not his duty to stop dressing like a thug. So if a rape victim wore a low-cut blouse and short shirt, you’d allow the defense to make a statement to that effect to be made in court in mitigation? You’re not comparing like with like.

    I was comparing: woman judging a man’s character from his appearance, and man judging a woman’s character from her appearance. Sorry my op was garbled.  I meant something like "So if a rape victim wore a low-cut blouse and short shirt, you’d allow the defense to make a statement to that effect in court in mitigation?" – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Azure has postulated that there is a *sufficient probability* that a man dressed like a thug is indeed a thug, and further, that a thug will be dangerous to her on any given occasion, that it is not worth her risking her safety by entering an enclosed metal box with him. It is reasonable to postulate as an equivalent case, that there is a sufficient probability that a woman dressed like a slut is indeed a slut, and further, that a slut will be available to you on any given occasion, that it is worth your risking the price of a pint of lager-and-lime and a bag of crisps to find out whether she’s available to you. It is not reasonable to postulate either that one should be at liberty to assault others based on their choice of clothing, or that taking purely defensive precautions for one’s own safety is equivalent to such an assault. Baba Yaga — Jupiter’s gone into Orion, and come into conjunction with Mars Saturn is wheeling across infinite space to its pre-ordained place in the stars And I gaze at the planets in wonder At the trouble and time they spend All to warn me to be careful In dealings involving a friend.  - Flanders and Swann

    – G.C. Note ANTI, SPAM and invalid to be removed if you’re e-mailing me.

    Response:

    alt.abuse.recovery: [Azure] – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – an example of this, is the burly men who choose to pump iron and dress like outlaw bikers but are hurt and insulted when much smaller women avoid going into elevators with them.  now, these men are always able to explain why someone *should not* feel fear, because the small woman "has no way of knowing for certain what was in his head" and "cannot read minds" and therefore doesn’t have the right to be "bigoted" and refuse to get into the elevator with him.  they feel that unless that woman has spent time talking with them, and finding out what they are like, that woman does not have the right to "discriminate" against him.  that it is talking, discussion, that will dispell the "misunderstanding."  and the responsibility for this is, of course, the woman’s — the receiver of the message — and not his, the sender of the message.  it’s her duty to get into the elevator willingly with him, not his duty to stop dressing like a thug. So if a rape victim wore a low-cut blouse and short shirt, you’d allow the defense to make a statement to that effect to be made in court in mitigation?

    You’re not comparing like with like. Azure has postulated that there is a *sufficient probability* that a man dressed like a thug is indeed a thug, and further, that a thug will be dangerous to her on any given occasion, that it is not worth her risking her safety by entering an enclosed metal box with him. It is reasonable to postulate as an equivalent case, that there is a sufficient probability that a woman dressed like a slut is indeed a slut, and further, that a slut will be available to you on any given occasion, that it is worth your risking the price of a pint of lager-and-lime and a bag of crisps to find out whether she’s available to you. It is not reasonable to postulate either that one should be at liberty to assault others based on their choice of clothing, or that taking purely defensive precautions for one’s own safety is equivalent to such an assault. Baba Yaga — Jupiter’s gone into Orion, and come into conjunction with Mars Saturn is wheeling across infinite space to its pre-ordained place in the stars And I gaze at the planets in wonder At the trouble and time they spend All to warn me to be careful In dealings involving a friend.  - Flanders and Swann

    Response:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – – sharing some readings here  from The Gift of Fear by Gavin de Becker – ;) "It is a process more extraordinary and ultimately more logical in the natural order than the most fantastic computer calculation. It is our most complex cognitive process and at the same time the simplest.     Intuition connects us to the natural world and to our nature. Freed from the bonds of judgment, married only to perception, it carries us to predictions we will later marvel at." yes, you’re right.  furthermore, people can’t *prove* why they are justified in feeling fear, it’s not something they can be right or wrong about, and it’s not something that other people (especially the ones they fear) have the right to badger them about. an example of this, is the burly men who choose to pump iron and dress like outlaw bikers but are hurt and insulted when much smaller women avoid going into elevators with them.  now, these men are always able to explain why someone *should not* feel fear, because the small woman "has no way of knowing for certain what was in his head" and "cannot read minds" and therefore doesn’t have the right to be "bigoted" and refuse to get into the elevator with him.  they feel that unless that woman has spent time talking with them, and finding out what they are like, that woman does not have the right to "discriminate" against him.  that it is talking, discussion, that will dispell the "misunderstanding."  and the responsibility for this is, of course, the woman’s — the receiver of the message — and not his, the sender of the message.  it’s her duty to get into the elevator willingly with him, not his duty to stop dressing like a thug.

    So if a rape victim wore a low-cut blouse and short shirt, you’d allow the defense to make a statement to that effect to be made in court in mitigation? — G.C. Note ANTI, SPAM and invalid to be removed if you’re e-mailing me.

    Response:

    – sharing some readings here  from The Gift of Fear by Gavin de Becker – ;) "It is a process more extraordinary and ultimately more logical in the natural order than the most fantastic computer calculation. It is our most complex cognitive process and at the same time the simplest.     Intuition connects us to the natural world and to our nature. Freed from the bonds of judgment, married only to perception, it carries us to predictions we will later marvel at."

    yes, you’re right.  furthermore, people can’t *prove* why they are justified in feeling fear, it’s not something they can be right or wrong about, and it’s not something that other people (especially the ones they fear) have the right to badger them about. an example of this, is the burly men who choose to pump iron and dress like outlaw bikers but are hurt and insulted when much smaller women avoid going into elevators with them.  now, these men are always able to explain why someone *should not* feel fear, because the small woman "has no way of knowing for certain what was in his head" and "cannot read minds" and therefore doesn’t have the right to be "bigoted" and refuse to get into the elevator with him.  they feel that unless that woman has spent time talking with them, and finding out what they are like, that woman does not have the right to "discriminate" against him.  that it is talking, discussion, that will dispell the "misunderstanding."  and the responsibility for this is, of course, the woman’s — the receiver of the message — and not his, the sender of the message.  it’s her duty to get into the elevator willingly with him, not his duty to stop dressing like a thug. just last night i was channel-surfing and saw a cop show where a child-killer lured a little girl out of a playground.  it was so smoothly done.  he very easily talked down every single one of her safeguards.  and this was not a stupid girl.  he wanted her to go off with him — to "find his lost puppy" — and by discussion, he nullified every objection she had to doing so.  but, you see, she was a reasonable person and if he wanted to discuss it, she had to discuss it.  she was not allowed to make snap judgements.  she couldn’t *prove* he was up to no good, so her very reasonableness got her into his car.  you could tell all along that she had misgivings, but he had a "reasonable answer" to each misgiving.   (then the very unreasonable, close-minded, non-discussing cop came by and stopped the situation from ending tragically.) and this is bullshit.  people make most decisions "by the seat of their pants," so to speak.  by aid of intuition and their experience of how human relations operate.  the little girl did not have enough experience to know that men who actually do lose puppies do not go up to children and ask them to help find it.  she wasn’t aware that this is a very common predator ploy. but if she had, i’m sure there is someone who would say, "But how did she know *for sure* that in *this particular instance* this man did NOT lose a puppy?"  and indeed this is true — she could not.  but i think her safety is important enough to give that the benefit of the doubt.  she was not obligated to risk herself in order to meet that twisted man’s twisted needs. and i find it an endearing but sad commentary on survivors that we are so often conned into believing we are. i guess, to wrap up, i’d say that if you look like a duck, quack like a duck, and waddle like a duck, you should not be angry or even surprised if people try to slather you with orange sauce. azure

    Response:

    - sharing some readings here  from The Gift of Fear by Gavin de Becker –  ;) "It is a process more extraordinary and ultimately more logical in the natural order than the most fantastic computer calculation. It is our most complex cognitive process and at the same time the simplest.     Intuition connects us to the natural world and to our nature. Freed from the bonds of judgment, married only to perception, it carries us to predictions we will later marvel at."

    Response:


  • Abuse or no?

    Question:

    but it frightens me. Did I do any harm….? Have I damaged someone…? Will it come back to haunt me…? What do you think..?

    hey confused dude … toss your horoscope and see if you have any sag or scorpio houses going on … some people whole generations in fact were rasied by a harsh hand and a harsh life … even hating God or their life in what it handed them … hating their screwed up parents … and having a hard time getting that forgiveness, letting go, understanding the pain they are in … mostly cause they will not feel their own pain. seems you might not be that way … the frighten part – ask for more love to be put into that place of fear … ask for help from a higher power … GreatGrandMother is Coyote I hear … as for teen age exploration and sex trips … abuse vectors happen … some 5 year old plays with another 5 year old – cause the first 5 year old is getting it from the 40 year old neighbor guy … and the abuse vector goes that way.   abuse happens, maybe it happened to you – and you are the victim and not the perp – and it was not mutual at all … you were played man…. that kid fucked you with hot dry angry sex — just like the perp who taught him about that … there was no love to it. as for your own sexuality – that is another matter entirely and you have to live with being a good person now and doing no harm now … and for ever more. that will do more than agnoize over the past like that – and seeing it for it what was … and still it happened and you have to cry tears out over it. so make that ok and feel the pain as it washes you clean. sumbuddie wishes you well get some traditional chinese accupunture – more healthy pricks in your life with all the toxic pricks you have had … it carries around with you some … women who have been sexually molested in childhood and raped in adult hood or man handled by toxic prick husbands and boyfriends – especially run right into chinese ancient 5 element style accupuncture right now and get those healthy pricks stuck into you right now as many as you can as fast as you can. good luck in your recovery dude :)

    Response:

    I think you’re trolling.  Thank you for letting me share.

    sure he is … but there is an opportunity to put love into the disease and help make the world a better place for children to grow up in. it is always the lies that make the dysfunctional family system that dooms the abused children to act out on as adults until they wake up from the pain of crashing … then the pain might be less then the pain of staying sick. supposedly only 4% seem to be making it of late … the others die off in their own personal jonestown … and its suppose to be all God … and I am to trust the process … so I keep putting love into the disease is the only thing that seems to have any hope of working while on the journey.  maybe gives me something to do … take up my time. sumbuddie who cares :)

    Response:

    Big deal, you kissed and jacked eachother off. You have not did anything worth shouting about. You did not have oral sex or anal intercourse, so why are you reliving these sences in your brain.  You are just like the 99% of us kids when we were young, Did you ever set in a circle naked, having jacking off contest to see who would cum the first? Or measure your penis to see who had the longest, Or have a young girl ask you about the lump in your pants when you was 12 years old. (This girl was a preteen and I could not understand why she did not know the facts of life as we all did) But said girl got knocked up at 12 years old and her mother was insisting it was a virgin birth until the girl started talking about playing with the older boys.  

    Response:

    *I think that the idea that a three year age difference turns consensual activity into abuse is a pernicious one, and the occasion of much misery. Unless you have other reason to think ’twas abusive (such as having had a tendency to bully others, or such as his being a habitual victim), I shouldn’t worry about it, but devote myself to living with as much respect for others (and self, of course – the two go together to a surprising degree) as I could *now* – which, frankly, is often all one can do anyway. If you do have other reason to think that the relationship was abusive, would you be able to make contact with the person concerned, to find out how *he* feels about it?  Be aware, tho’, that there’s a danger in that, that a previously unregarded matter may prey on his mind as it has on yours – or that he may feel intruded on.  (No, there are no certainties.) Silent reparation may be better; and it may be that the only means of doing that are indirect.  Simply treating others well, & practising that ability, is no small thing – of that, I *am sure.  Once that’s well in hand, if it seems not enough, and if you can restrain the instinct to rescue others at the price of their own autonomy, go & work with victims of abuse, or *whatever you’re cut out for*.  Who cares exactly what, so long as it’s of value? Baba Yaga – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi, Second Time Posting…I know this is self-indulgent but it is bothering me…or should i say im letting it bother me There’s something thats been playing on my mind for a while now ; perhaps I’m worrying unneccesarily, but anyone’s opinion would be welcome. I’m a twenty-something hetero guy, who had a brief adolescent flirtation with homosexuality when about 14 or 15. It was just a passing phase, and until recently I’d largely forgotten about it. There was nothing hard-core about the handful of encounters I had either ; just nervous fondling/kissing/some tossing-off and the like. Question is, the guy I did it with was three years younger than me ; so he would have been 11 or 12 at the time. I’m not in contact with him anymore, but have worried of late if these long-past acts make me some kind of abuser. I try telling myself that I was three years older and basically a child myself ; but it still plays on my mind. I worry about it. It’s so long ago the details are sketchy, I agonise over whether it was all as mutual as I originally thought ; I still think it was, but it frightens me. Did I do any harm….? Have I damaged someone…? Will it come back to haunt me…? What do you think..?

    – The path to wisdom does, in fact, begin with a single step.  Where people go wrong is in ignoring all the thousands of other steps that come after it.  They make the single step of deciding to become one with the universe, and for some reason forget to take the logical next step of living for seventy years on a mountain and a daily bowl of rice and yak-butter tea.  While evidence says that the road to Hell is paved with good intentions, they’re probably all on first steps.  - Terry Pratchett

    Response:

    Question is, the guy I did it with was three years younger than me ; so he would have been 11 or 12 at the time. I’m not in contact with him anymore, but have worried of late if these long-past acts make me some kind of abuser. I try telling myself that I was three years older and basically a child myself ; but it still plays on my mind. I worry about it. It’s so long ago the details are sketchy, I agonise over whether it was all as mutual as I originally thought ; I still think it was, but it frightens me. Did I do any harm….? Have I damaged someone…?

    get in touch with the dude and ask him. do you think someone who doesn’t know either of you from adam is going to know if you abused him or not? Will it come back to haunt me…?

    seems to be what it’s doing now. cal

    Response:

    (Second Time Replying) I think that would be hard to say.  It may be within the range of peer curiousity.  It may depend on what your influence was over him and the circumstances surrounding the occurances.  Was it a result of mutual curiousity or based on your size difference, intellectual capacity or position of authority (perceived or real).  In retrospect, how do you think he perceived the incidents now? Panther

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi, Second Time Posting…I know this is self-indulgent but it is bothering me…or should i say im letting it bother me There’s something thats been playing on my mind for a while now ; perhaps I’m worrying unneccesarily, but anyone’s opinion would be welcome. I’m a twenty-something hetero guy, who had a brief adolescent flirtation with homosexuality when about 14 or 15. It was just a passing phase, and until recently I’d largely forgotten about it. There was nothing hard-core about the handful of encounters I had either ; just nervous fondling/kissing/some tossing-off and the like. Question is, the guy I did it with was three years younger than me ; so he would have been 11 or 12 at the time. I’m not in contact with him anymore, but have worried of late if these long-past acts make me some kind of abuser. I try telling myself that I was three years older and basically a child myself ; but it still plays on my mind. I worry about it. It’s so long ago the details are sketchy, I agonise over whether it was all as mutual as I originally thought ; I still think it was, but it frightens me. Did I do any harm….? Have I damaged someone…? Will it come back to haunt me…? What do you think..?

    Response:

    :::::bait snipped::::: What do you think..?

    I think you’re trolling.  Thank you for letting me share.

    Response:

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi, Second Time Posting…I know this is self-indulgent but it is bothering me…or should i say im letting it bother me There’s something thats been playing on my mind for a while now ; perhaps I’m worrying unneccesarily, but anyone’s opinion would be welcome. I’m a twenty-something hetero guy, who had a brief adolescent flirtation with homosexuality when about 14 or 15. It was just a passing phase, and until recently I’d largely forgotten about it. There was nothing hard-core about the handful of encounters I had either ; just nervous fondling/kissing/some tossing-off and the like. Question is, the guy I did it with was three years younger than me ; so he would have been 11 or 12 at the time. I’m not in contact with him anymore, but have worried of late if these long-past acts make me some kind of abuser. I try telling myself that I was three years older and basically a child myself ; but it still plays on my mind. I worry about it. It’s so long ago the details are sketchy, I agonise over whether it was all as mutual as I originally thought ; I still think it was, but it frightens me. Did I do any harm….? Have I damaged someone…? Will it come back to haunt me…? What do you think..?

    I think you were a couple of kids experimenting.

    Response:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi, Second Time Posting…I know this is self-indulgent but it is bothering me…or should i say im letting it bother me There’s something thats been playing on my mind for a while now ; perhaps I’m worrying unneccesarily, but anyone’s opinion would be welcome. I’m a twenty-something hetero guy, who had a brief adolescent flirtation with homosexuality when about 14 or 15. It was just a passing phase, and until recently I’d largely forgotten about it. There was nothing hard-core about the handful of encounters I had either ; just nervous fondling/kissing/some tossing-off and the like. Question is, the guy I did it with was three years younger than me ; so he would have been 11 or 12 at the time. I’m not in contact with him anymore, but have worried of late if these long-past acts make me some kind of abuser. I try telling myself that I was three years older and basically a child myself ; but it still plays on my mind. I worry about it. It’s so long ago the details are sketchy, I agonise over whether it was all as mutual as I originally thought ; I still think it was, but it frightens me. Did I do any harm….? Have I damaged someone…? Will it come back to haunt me…? What do you think..?

    Response:


  • Susan and I Tie The Knot

    Question:

    You faggots and bull dydkes need to read the Bible that says Adam and Eve. Nothing says anything marriages between same sex people. The Bible calls such action  "An  insult to God" or words to that effect.  What excuse are you going to tell God when you are dead and standing in front of the judgement throme. But God, I was lonely and she/he  was lonely so we got together and became a family and helped drain the resorces of every community.  

    Response:

    | You faggots and bull dydkes need to read the Bible that says Adam and | Eve. So no one may marry unless their names are Adam and Eve? | Nothing says anything marriages between same sex people. Is there a sentence in there somewhere? | The Bible calls such action  "An  insult to God" or words to that | effect. In other words, you can’t put your finger on specific verses? |  What excuse are you going to tell God when you are dead and | standing in front of the judgement throme. Maybe they would say that God’s command, as taught by Jesus, was to Love thy neighbor.  That doesn’t necessarily mean marry him or her, but what it certainly forbids is the kind of hatred you are spitting forth here.  So what would YOUR excuse be before Him? Is it not also written, "Judge not, that ye may be judged"? | But God, I was lonely and | she/he  was lonely so we got together and became a family and helped | drain the resorces of every community. Drain the resources(sic)?  A bit of editorializing thrown in for good measure, eh? And without any elaboration to dispute. For the record, I am neither Christian nor gay.  I just have a low tolerance for ignorance and bigotry, both of which your diatribe reeks of. Your soapbox is rather flimsy.  Better step down before you hurt yourself.

    Response:

    You faggots and bull dydkes need to read the Bible that says Adam and

    what excuse are you going to give for your hatred and bigotry?  who exactly is supposed to be the one passing judgment?  it is by *your* actions that *you* will be judged.  words are actions.  i think you need to re-read that book of yours. — astri

    Response:

    You faggots and bull dydkes need to read the Bible that says Adam and Eve. Nothing says anything marriages between same sex people. The Bible calls such action  "An  insult to God" or words to that effect.  What excuse are you going to tell God when you are dead and standing in front of the judgement throme. But God, I was lonely and she/he  was lonely so we got together and became a family and helped drain the resorces of every community.

    some God who you’ve invented to forward you silly ideas on being a bigoted angry little person…. I hope you recover from whatever abuse your here to recover from…. Good luck with it tinytim – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –

    Response:

    You faggots and bull dydkes need to read the Bible that says Adam and Eve.

    You mean the one that says "Love you neighbor as yourself" and "Do unto others as you would have done unto you"?  How about the one that says "Judge not, let you be judged" or "Let ye without sin among you cast the first stone"?  Which part of that Bible are you living up to? Nothing says anything marriages between same sex people.

    The Bible doesn’t say anything about cars, or planes, or television, or the internet either.  Are you saying that everything the Bible doesn’t say anything about is evil?  If so, why do you listen to the radio, or drink coffee, or wear sneakers?  Why is it okay for you to do things that the Bible doesn’t explicitly sanction, but it isn’t for me? The Bible calls such action  "An  insult to God" or words to that effect.  

    You’re going to have to make up your mind.  Either the Bible doesn’t say anything about it, or it does – which is it?  And, if it does, you’ll certainly be able to quote me where it says, explicitly, "thou shalt not marry people of the same sex together", won’t you?  Have fun looking. What excuse are you going to tell God when you are dead and standing in front of the judgement throme.

    I’m going to say, "God, I’ve done my best to be a good person, an honest person, a kind person, a person people can count on for help, and a person who encourages others to do the right thing.  I know I’ve messed up, even though I haven’t wanted to, and I’m sorry.  Please forgive me." What are you going to say?  That you hated everybody, all those fags and dykes and niggers, and you wanted the KKK to kill them all?  How do you think *that* is going to go over with God? If you’re going to wave a Bible at me, at least have the guts to admit that you’re picking and choosing what parts of the Bible *you* follow.   That you pick out every verse that gives you an excuse to hate somebody, but that you conveniently forget the responsibility that Jesus laid on you, to look beyond our differences and your own prejudices, and find the love for every man and woman that God has put inside you.  I submit that it is that responsibility that you are failing, and you’ll have to answer for it when you die, along with everyone else who is using the Bible as an excuse for their own bigotry. But God, I was lonely and she/he  was lonely so we got together and became a family and helped drain the resorces of every community.  

    You’re giving Susan and I a lot of credit if you think we’re going to drain the resources of every community.   We’d have to be pretty busy!   But, in truth, we probably add more to the community we live in than you do to yours.  As a household, we’re in six figures, and creeping upward.   We almost certainly pay more taxes in a year than you do, and if the Federal government requires us to file as a married couple we’re going to end up paying even more.  Something the religious right conveniently forgot to tell you is that we’ll all end up paying *more* taxes, not less, if our marriages are recognized at a Federal level. Our business gives 10% of its proceeds to charity, and we’re both active in different charities as volunteers.  We were just laughing a little while ago, since the only evening we *don’t* have some non-profit activity planned is Friday night – and we’ve got that night scheduled for getting to sleep early! So, who’s more of a drain on the community?  My wife and I, or you?  How much do you kick into the coffers of the Treasury a year?  How much do you give back to the community through charitable donations and work for non-profits?  How much of a contribution do you make to help other people become more productive members of society?   It’s very revealing that, at the heart of it, the religious right’s objection to same-sex marriages isn’t merely moral, but monetary.   They’d rather the children of long-term, stable, same-sex relationships be in legal limbo, or destitute, than recognize their right to the same protections and benefits that the children of opposite-sex married couples have when one of their parents dies unexpectedly.  They’d rather force the widow of a gay woman to sell the house they bought together to pay the inheritance taxes than recognize her right to inherit from her spouse.  And they’d rather see same-sex spouses deprived of quality health care than see big business have to make insurance available for them.   It is an outrage that these basic human rights are being charactized by the religious right as "draining the resources of the community".  We are not some group outside the community that is hovering like vampires waiting for our chance to bleed it dry, we are part of the community.   It’s about time that we were treated like it.   Katherine

    Response:

    You faggots and bull dydkes need to read the Bible that says Adam and Eve. You mean the one that says "Love you neighbor as yourself" and "Do unto others as you would have done unto you"?  How about the one that says "Judge not, let you be judged" or "Let ye without sin among you cast the first stone"?  Which part of that Bible are you living up to?

    …that should be "without sin *amongst* you" King James Just going alongst with the flow… Doncha know!  :o) – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Nothing says anything marriages between same sex people. The Bible doesn’t say anything about cars, or planes, or television, or the internet either.  Are you saying that everything the Bible doesn’t say anything about is evil?  If so, why do you listen to the radio, or drink coffee, or wear sneakers?  Why is it okay for you to do things that the Bible doesn’t explicitly sanction, but it isn’t for me? The Bible calls such action  "An  insult to God" or words to that effect.   You’re going to have to make up your mind.  Either the Bible doesn’t say anything about it, or it does – which is it?  And, if it does, you’ll certainly be able to quote me where it says, explicitly, "thou shalt not marry people of the same sex together", won’t you?  Have fun looking. What excuse are you going to tell God when you are dead and standing in front of the judgement throme. I’m going to say, "God, I’ve done my best to be a good person, an honest person, a kind person, a person people can count on for help, and a person who encourages others to do the right thing.  I know I’ve messed up, even though I haven’t wanted to, and I’m sorry.  Please forgive me." What are you going to say?  That you hated everybody, all those fags and dykes and niggers, and you wanted the KKK to kill them all?  How do you think *that* is going to go over with God? If you’re going to wave a Bible at me, at least have the guts to admit that you’re picking and choosing what parts of the Bible *you* follow.   That you pick out every verse that gives you an excuse to hate somebody, but that you conveniently forget the responsibility that Jesus laid on you, to look beyond our differences and your own prejudices, and find the love for every man and woman that God has put inside you.  I submit that it is that responsibility that you are failing, and you’ll have to answer for it when you die, along with everyone else who is using the Bible as an excuse for their own bigotry. But God, I was lonely and she/he  was lonely so we got together and became a family and helped drain the resorces of every community.   You’re giving Susan and I a lot of credit if you think we’re going to drain the resources of every community.   We’d have to be pretty busy!   But, in truth, we probably add more to the community we live in than you do to yours.  As a household, we’re in six figures, and creeping upward.   We almost certainly pay more taxes in a year than you do, and if the Federal government requires us to file as a married couple we’re going to end up paying even more.  Something the religious right conveniently forgot to tell you is that we’ll all end up paying *more* taxes, not less, if our marriages are recognized at a Federal level. Our business gives 10% of its proceeds to charity, and we’re both active in different charities as volunteers.  We were just laughing a little while ago, since the only evening we *don’t* have some non-profit activity planned is Friday night – and we’ve got that night scheduled for getting to sleep early! So, who’s more of a drain on the community?  My wife and I, or you?  How much do you kick into the coffers of the Treasury a year?  How much do you give back to the community through charitable donations and work for non-profits?  How much of a contribution do you make to help other people become more productive members of society?   It’s very revealing that, at the heart of it, the religious right’s objection to same-sex marriages isn’t merely moral, but monetary.   They’d rather the children of long-term, stable, same-sex relationships be in legal limbo, or destitute, than recognize their right to the same protections and benefits that the children of opposite-sex married couples have when one of their parents dies unexpectedly.  They’d rather force the widow of a gay woman to sell the house they bought together to pay the inheritance taxes than recognize her right to inherit from her spouse.  And they’d rather see same-sex spouses deprived of quality health care than see big business have to make insurance available for them.   It is an outrage that these basic human rights are being charactized by the religious right as "draining the resources of the community".  We are not some group outside the community that is hovering like vampires waiting for our chance to bleed it dry, we are part of the community.   It’s about time that we were treated like it.   Katherine

    Response:

    Kathy: I think I will end the class over same sex marriages, I think you should really know that I was trying to pick your brains and get you to tell me just what  means do the two of you enjoy sexual relations. The fact you married some woman is no big deal to me.  But coming out against it, I wanted to see who would come out of the closet and defend your marriage.  As for religious views, the only church I have ever attended very much was the Mormon Church but  my views on plural marriages, and the fact my bishop had a ripe high breasted wife who was about 30 years young than her husband, got me kicked out of the LDS church. I truthful have not read a Bible in 25 years I guess. I am an evil old redneck racist who is now pushing the 80 year old mark, I hate and really do not care what people here think.   Take care, Gals;  I is de Goldenman

    Response:

    You mean the one that says "Love you neighbor as yourself" and "Do unto others as you would have done unto you"?  How about the one that says "Judge not, let you be judged" or "Let ye without sin among you cast the first stone"?  Which part of that Bible are you living up to? …that should be "without sin *amongst* you" King James Just going alongst with the flow… Doncha know!  :o)

    Heh.  I thank thee for thy correction, thou art an observant fellow! ;-) Katherine

    Response:

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – You mean the one that says "Love you neighbor as yourself" and "Do unto others as you would have done unto you"?  How about the one that says "Judge not, let you be judged" or "Let ye without sin among you cast the first stone"?  Which part of that Bible are you living up to? …that should be "without sin *amongst* you" King James Just going alongst with the flow… Doncha know!  :o) Heh.  I thank thee for thy correction,

    No probs.  You deserved it!  :o) thou art an observant fellow! ;-)

    Yeah…  depending on thy situation…  verily I sayeth unto you…  depressingly so. Though on thy flippeth side…  it serveth me extremely well professionally. Gotta taketh the good right alongst with the not so good though, I reckoneth. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Katherine

    Response:

    I HATES everything

    I’m sorry that you hate everything, it must be awful. Katherine

    Response:

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Church! What in the Hell do I want to attend some weeping willow of a church whose main goal seems to collect a tith from its members even if said party does not have money to feed themselves or their families but insists on that ttith so to support the church.  Then I see the minister driving down the street in a $45,000 car so to spread the word of the Church while the members ride the public transit or walk. I calls event as I sees them and a black man can be a spook, niggers, Black mother fucker etc and the same for all male homosexuals which can be faggots, ass hole bandits, dick suckers etc and women who desire marriage or love from another woman can be a bull dyke, pussy bandit, tit sucker, fems, lesbs, and you name it. A white person can be a white mother fucker, or whitie, or whatever you want to call them. I HATES everything and look for the day when oorganizations like the KKK and the like to return and shape up this United States. Then we will get rid of the illegal wetbacks, spooks, same sex marriages, certain religion groups and city officials like tthe Mayor of San Francisco when we hang them all to see them swing in de breeze.  When a person can walk down the street without some homeless bum or drunken nigger trying to steal or rape them; that will be freedom.

    I sense that your having a problem adapting to the ever changing world that we occupy….  There must be some remote island somewhere, there just has to be, that has not yet discovered the wheel, where you could go and live out the rest of your unhappiness… there must be I feel sorry for you, so full of rage and venom.. tell us WHY? Us queers ‘n dykes can be real nice folks….. if you could just grow and develop as a human being, you’d see that!! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –

    Response:

    Church! What in the Hell do I want to attend some weeping willow of a church whose main goal seems to collect a tith from its members even if said party does not have money to feed themselves or their families but insists on that ttith so to support the church.  Then I see the minister driving down the street in a $45,000 car so to spread the word of the Church while the members ride the public transit or walk. I calls event as I sees them and a black man can be a spook, niggers, Black mother fucker etc and the same for all male homosexuals which can be faggots, ass hole bandits, dick suckers etc and women who desire marriage or love from another woman can be a bull dyke, pussy bandit, tit sucker, fems, lesbs, and you name it. A white person can be a white mother fucker, or whitie, or whatever you want to call them. I HATES everything and look for the day when oorganizations like the KKK and the like to return and shape up this United States. Then we will get rid of the illegal wetbacks, spooks, same sex marriages, certain religion groups and city officials like tthe Mayor of San Francisco when we hang them all to see them swing in de breeze.  When a person can walk down the street without some homeless bum or drunken nigger trying to steal or rape them; that will be freedom.  

    Response:

    Aloha friends – As you may have heard, Multnomah County, in Oregon, recently started issuing same-sex marriage licenses.  Susan and I were #22 in line Wednesday morning, and were one of the first couples married that day.   Figured I’d drop a line so that y’all who have met us would know that we’re hitched now. ;-) Katherine

    Response:

    Wonderful!! Congratulations to the both of you.  I hope you have many wonderful years more together. naomi Aloha friends – As you may have heard, Multnomah County, in Oregon, recently started issuing same-sex marriage licenses.  Susan and I were #22 in line Wednesday morning, and were one of the first couples married that day.   Figured I’d drop a line so that y’all who have met us would know that we’re hitched now. ;-) Katherine


  • assumptions ??

    Question:

    how to avoid false assumptions from others? how to repair or re-adjust?? aren’t all assumptions all false?? is it hopeless? are there lots of false assumptions because of the internet ways of communication?

    <Not sure who’s driving today, many nameless ones inside, but it’s not Bill or Michael – may be Rhiannon – she usually doesn’t come through "this side", but has once or twice, feels like her When it comes to the Internet, you have to act on one assumption, while feeling another: 1.  Respond and interact as though everything you’re hearing from others is true. 2.  Treat these interactions internally as though everything you’re hearing from others is a lie. The first one is about the only way to not become universally hated, and the second is about the only way to not become universally duped.  Sooner or later, if you interact with one individual long enough, you’ll get a better sense as to which of these two possibilities are true, and then can adjust your behavior or emotions accordingly. The anonymity of the Internet makes it quite a bit easier to lie, and few people can resist that temptation at some point or another (self most _definitely_ included).  Were one able to do some kind of reliable study on the matter, I’m sure the results would be conclusively this regarding the composition of the Internet, particularly places like IRC and Usenet: 75.0% spiteful, malicious fabrications; 15.0% well-intentioned fabrications;  5.0% true events taken out of context and mangled beyond all reasonable recognition just to make someone else look bad;  2.0% willful self-delusion just to make one’s self feel better;  1.5% ranting paranoia because you’re finally starting to figure it out;  1.0% disbelieving amusement because you’ve figured it out;  0.375% genuine, sincere attempts at communication;  0.125% who’ve figured it out, are tired at trying to find anybody worth truly communicating<< with and who just _really_ don’t *give* a $#|+ anymore. Personally, I blame it on Al Gore.  After all, he _invented_ the thing, right?  ;-DDDD The Internet is, however, a boon for dissociatives.  :-) Any one of us can come out and frolic as who we "really" are without being gawked at because our bodies don’t match our minds at that particular moment.

    Response:

    how to avoid false assumptions from others? how to repair or re-adjust?? aren’t all assumptions all false?? is it hopeless? are there lots of false assumptions because of the internet ways of communication? phoenix wondering and worried

    Response:

    how to avoid false assumptions from others? how to repair or re-adjust?? aren’t all assumptions all false?? is it hopeless? are there lots of false assumptions because of the internet ways of communication? <Not sure who’s driving today, many nameless ones inside, but it’s not Bill or Michael – may be Rhiannon – she usually doesn’t come through "this side", but has once or twice, feels like her

    it’s ok with me, whoever it is; thanks :) – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – When it comes to the Internet, you have to act on one assumption, while feeling another: 1.  Respond and interact as though everything you’re hearing from others is true. 2.  Treat these interactions internally as though everything you’re hearing from others is a lie. The first one is about the only way to not become universally hated, and the second is about the only way to not become universally duped.  Sooner or later, if you interact with one individual long enough, you’ll get a better sense as to which of these two possibilities are true, and then can adjust your behavior or emotions accordingly.

    i suppose today that i should have asked that question many years ago, it would have spare me huge amount of unnecessary pains :( i am ending up not knowing anymore who is abusive or not and why people do not react at all to abusive people??? i also see that *my definition of abusive might be quite different, that my being french and non american or north american makes me terribly different and that there is no real free possibility of my own expression with tolerance. you see, i have been stupid enough, used to communicate in almost 4 languages to believe that the net would be a great place to communicate with other people and it seems that i got all wrong: i learnt that i do not have my place on it, or only with people from my country, my language or the languages that are spoken around the country i am living in. too many persons do not have a clue about what i am talking about or why, it is simply impossible and so so sad :( i also feel terribly hurt and sad to have responded positively to someone who wanted to built a friendship with me, i did my best and acted as much as i could, but now i am dealing with things that seems so insane, so abusive, so dismissive that i just can’t understand. oh, i have no problem in letting the person go if that is the wish, but i don’t understand the game, i don’t understand the meanings, i don’t understand the refusal to explain and talk things out when there is a problem. problems can be worked out and fixed and growing can happen. for me a friendship remains even throught the difficulties in my reality and i apply this also on the net. am i so wrong about it? how is it possible?? each of us is as human in reality than here no?? sorry i feel really really bad. i end up wondering if all what my "friend" wants from me is just a public beating, can you imagine how tortuous? sorry, i think i am getting lost in my problems :( – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The anonymity of the Internet makes it quite a bit easier to lie, and few people can resist that temptation at some point or another (self most _definitely_ included).  Were one able to do some kind of reliable study on the matter, I’m sure the results would be conclusively this regarding the composition of the Internet, particularly places like IRC and Usenet: 75.0% spiteful, malicious fabrications; 15.0% well-intentioned fabrications;  5.0% true events taken out of context and mangled beyond all reasonable recognition just to make someone else look bad;  2.0% willful self-delusion just to make one’s self feel better;  1.5% ranting paranoia because you’re finally starting to figure it out;  1.0% disbelieving amusement because you’ve figured it out;  0.375% genuine, sincere attempts at communication;  0.125% who’ve figured it out, are tired at trying to find anybody worth truly communicating<< with and who just _really_ don’t *give* a $#|+ anymore.

    well, i must say that i am a very stupid person, because i always behave using my inner sincerity and honesty, so i suppose i felt in the category of those who are duped and an easy prey :( Personally, I blame it on Al Gore.  After all, he _invented_ the thing, right?  ;-DDDD

    oh, i won’t blame it on anybody else than me being me !!! and being french i learnt the hard way that *i have not one single right to express any disagrement about what can come or be said or done by someone like him !!! The Internet is, however, a boon for dissociatives.  :-) Any one of us can come out and frolic as who we "really" are without being gawked at because our bodies don’t match our minds at that particular moment.

    yes, this i understand i suppose that is why this place is more ok than others, it is clear that people are expressing in a different way, it is much more safer imho. thanks again phoenix

    Response:

    "are there lots of false assumptions because of the internet ways of communication?" A person once told Us, that people can act crappy, and get away from it. (Not the exact wording they used but whatever. :) ) It up to you really, to deside if they are really lies or not. But most of them, cuz you used the word "assumptions" is telling Us, they might be mostly lies. But again, you guys are the only ones who truely know. Then, you have 2 chioces. You can eitehr try to clear it up with them, (Please don’t try that one to long. It can hurt really bad if you do.) and 2. You can just ignore them. We hope this had been helpful. OneOfTheTribe: I think you are very wize to write what you did for this person, and on the thread that you made. :) .                             ManyMults System                             InsiderPerson – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – how to avoid false assumptions from others? how to repair or re-adjust?? aren’t all assumptions all false?? is it hopeless? are there lots of false assumptions because of the internet ways of communication? <Not sure who’s driving today, many nameless ones inside, but it’s not Bill or Michael – may be Rhiannon – she usually doesn’t come through "this side", but has once or twice, feels like her When it comes to the Internet, you have to act on one assumption, while feeling another: 1.  Respond and interact as though everything you’re hearing from others is true. 2.  Treat these interactions internally as though everything you’re hearing from others is a lie. The first one is about the only way to not become universally hated, and the second is about the only way to not become universally duped.  Sooner or later, if you interact with one individual long enough, you’ll get a better sense as to which of these two possibilities are true, and then can adjust your behavior or emotions accordingly. The anonymity of the Internet makes it quite a bit easier to lie, and few people can resist that temptation at some point or another (self most _definitely_ included).  Were one able to do some kind of reliable study on the matter, I’m sure the results would be conclusively this regarding the composition of the Internet, particularly places like IRC and Usenet: 75.0% spiteful, malicious fabrications; 15.0% well-intentioned fabrications;  5.0% true events taken out of context and mangled beyond all reasonable recognition just to make someone else look bad;  2.0% willful self-delusion just to make one’s self feel better;  1.5% ranting paranoia because you’re finally starting to figure it out;  1.0% disbelieving amusement because you’ve figured it out;  0.375% genuine, sincere attempts at communication;  0.125% who’ve figured it out, are tired at trying to find anybody worth truly communicating<< with and who just _really_ don’t *give* a $#|+ anymore. Personally, I blame it on Al Gore.  After all, he _invented_ the thing, right?  ;-DDDD The Internet is, however, a boon for dissociatives.  :-) Any one of us can come out and frolic as who we "really" are without being gawked at because our bodies don’t match our minds at that particular moment.

    Response:

    Just another  thought to add to the list. I was told a definition of assume is like this ASS /U / ME to assume you know the full meaning of what the other person is thinking or saying is to make an ASS/ out of / U/ and / ME Trixie

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – X-No-Archive: Yes how to avoid false assumptions from others? Do you mean others’ false assumptions about you? Or do you mean how to avoid reading into others’ posts, false assumptions about you? Or do you mean you avoiding making false assumptions of others? Not sure I follow, sorry. how to repair or re-adjust?? Discovering an assumption is false tells you more than if your assumption had originally been correct. Kinda like watching the evening news only to hear what isn’t said. Re-adjustment is a constant process. And repair follows naturally. Yes, it’s very difficult to trust yourself that this will happen in time. aren’t all assumptions all false?? Not necessarily. is it hopeless? Nah, not to worry. are there lots of false assumptions because of the internet ways of communication? Sure. But in the end it doesn’t really matter as you interact with others only by the words that are typed and transmitted. If that works, then it really doesn’t matter. If it doesn’t, well, it’s a pretty wild place out across the backbone, there’s always someone else willing and able to be honest. phoenix wondering and worried Nope this helps you not worry, Just Pete — Please add "X-No-Archive: yes" to header — For more information about this NNTP posting service, contact: If you want an anonymous account, visit our sign-up page: https://asarian-host.net/cgi-bin/signup.cgi

    Response:

    "are there lots of false assumptions because of the internet ways of communication?" A person once told Us, that people can act crappy, and get away from it. (Not the exact wording they used but whatever. :) )

    yes, i have seen that myself, it felt to me as if there is no real values anymore, i do not mean here moral values but more of internal values of self esteem and integrity. It up to you really, to deside if they are really lies or not. But most of them, cuz you used the word "assumptions" is telling Us, they might be mostly lies. But again, you guys are the only ones who truely know. Then, you have 2 chioces. You can eitehr try to clear it up with them, (Please don’t try that one to long. It can hurt really bad if you do.) and 2. You can just ignore them.

    ignore for some is difficult, and yes indeed trying to clear it up hurt really really bad, i will try to be careful . thanks We hope this had been helpful. OneOfTheTribe: I think you are very wize to write what you did for this person, and on the thread that you made. :) .                             ManyMults System                             InsiderPerson

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – how to avoid false assumptions from others? how to repair or re-adjust?? aren’t all assumptions all false?? is it hopeless? are there lots of false assumptions because of the internet ways of communication? <Not sure who’s driving today, many nameless ones inside, but it’s not Bill or Michael – may be Rhiannon – she usually doesn’t come through "this side", but has once or twice, feels like her When it comes to the Internet, you have to act on one assumption, while feeling another: 1.  Respond and interact as though everything you’re hearing from others is true. 2.  Treat these interactions internally as though everything you’re hearing from others is a lie. The first one is about the only way to not become universally hated, and the second is about the only way to not become universally duped.  Sooner or later, if you interact with one individual long enough, you’ll get a better sense as to which of these two possibilities are true, and then can adjust your behavior or emotions accordingly. The anonymity of the Internet makes it quite a bit easier to lie, and few people can resist that temptation at some point or another (self most _definitely_ included).  Were one able to do some kind of reliable study on the matter, I’m sure the results would be conclusively this regarding the composition of the Internet, particularly places like IRC and Usenet: 75.0% spiteful, malicious fabrications; 15.0% well-intentioned fabrications;  5.0% true events taken out of context and mangled beyond all reasonable recognition just to make someone else look bad;  2.0% willful self-delusion just to make one’s self feel better;  1.5% ranting paranoia because you’re finally starting to figure it out;  1.0% disbelieving amusement because you’ve figured it out;  0.375% genuine, sincere attempts at communication;  0.125% who’ve figured it out, are tired at trying to find anybody worth truly communicating<< with and who just _really_ don’t *give* a $#|+ anymore. Personally, I blame it on Al Gore.  After all, he _invented_ the thing, right?  ;-DDDD The Internet is, however, a boon for dissociatives.  :-) Any one of us can come out and frolic as who we "really" are without being gawked at because our bodies don’t match our minds at that particular moment.

    Response:

    alt.support.dissociation: thanks, it is just so hard for someone like me to trust slowly and then years later to end up in such a sad and destructive way :( i just can’t understand how something that has been going on for years in a nice way could vanish and be destroyed so easily and without real explanations but only false accusations and assumptions, not giving one cent of clean air to breath :(

    8-( indeed.  It hurts terribly. A guess as to how?  Pain, fear, old scripts activated.  They can be activated by such small things, sometimes; only if one could go back far enough would one discover how large the small things loom. Sometimes they can be out-waited: sometimes not.  A good friendship can be worth it, if one can shield oneself from arrows really meant for something/one long gone.  Either way, I think it generally helps (‘though not always "enough", lord knows) to recognise the storm as not really directed at oneself, but at the old source of pain. Something I took to heart, ’cause it rang so true: "avoid people with a core of hatred, be careful around people with a core of pain, seek out people with a core of health." Baba Yaga — Heretics are the only remedy against the entropy of human thought.  - Yevgeny Zamyatin

    Response:

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – alt.support.dissociation: thanks, it is just so hard for someone like me to trust slowly and then years later to end up in such a sad and destructive way :( i just can’t understand how something that has been going on for years in a nice way could vanish and be destroyed so easily and without real explanations but only false accusations and assumptions, not giving one cent of clean air to breath :( 8-( indeed.  It hurts terribly. A guess as to how?  Pain, fear, old scripts activated.  They can be activated by such small things, sometimes; only if one could go back far enough would one discover how large the small things loom. Sometimes they can be out-waited: sometimes not.  A good friendship can be worth it, if one can shield oneself from arrows really meant for something/one long gone.  Either way, I think it generally helps (‘though not always "enough", lord knows) to recognise the storm as not really directed at oneself, but at the old source of pain.

    yes, this is right, i thought that there was something that wasn’t related to me at all, *i wasn’t the real ennemy, it was an old pain, but one who functions like a devastator, it is so sad. Something I took to heart, ’cause it rang so true: "avoid people with a core of hatred, be careful around people with a core of pain, seek out people with a core of health." Baba Yaga — Heretics are the only remedy against the entropy of human thought.  - Yevgeny Zamyatin

    i think i should print those words about avoiding people with hatred or pain !!! but you see, i am considering lately that for many many years in my life when there was something violent people around would come and ask me for help, even while i was very young in my 20th or less, as if it was written on my face that *i knew how to deal with violences and indeed i knew and always manage to solve the situation in a peaceful way, it was for me as if i just got inspired or something like that, then it took me so many years to resist and fight this, i even have been accused of not assuming my knowledge or running away from myself, but slowly i started to dare to think that when there was some violence somewhere it wasn’t *my problem per s